77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23589995)
41. Cervical cytology in Zambia.
Grech ES; O'Dowd MJ; Tsirkina GA; Zeigler O
Med J Zambia; 1977; 11(4):112-7. PubMed ID: 919781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effectiveness of an organized cervical cancer screening program in Korea: results from a cohort study.
Jun JK; Choi KS; Jung KW; Lee HY; Gapstur SM; Park EC; Yoo KY
Int J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 124(1):188-93. PubMed ID: 18785204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Screening patterns within organized programs and survival of Italian women with invasive cervical cancer.
Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Ferretti S; Franzo A; Falcini F; Visioli CB; Zanetti R; Biavati P; La Rosa F; Baracco S; Federico M; Campari C; De Togni A; Piffer S; Pannozzo F; Fusco M; Michiara M; Castaing M; Seghini P; Tisano F; Serraino D;
Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 57(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23732239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Why lesbians should be encouraged to have regular cervical screening.
Henderson HJ
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2009 Jan; 35(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19126320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cervical cancer in women under 25 years of age in Queensland, Australia: To what extent is the diagnosis made by screening cytology?
Morgan EL; Sanday K; Budd A; Hammond IG; Nicklin J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Aug; 57(4):469-472. PubMed ID: 28580578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Colposcopy attendance and deprivation: A retrospective analysis of 27,193 women in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.
Douglas E; Wardle J; Massat NJ; Waller J
Br J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 113(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 25996205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Progression of 189 women diagnosed with uterine cervical dysplasia based on abnormal results in mass screening.
Muramatsu T; Yoshitake T; Iida T; Yamashita E; Hirasawa T; Miyamoto T; Murakami M; Matsui N; Kajiwara H; Yasuda M; Osamura RY; Mikami M
Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2006 Dec; 31(4):141-5. PubMed ID: 21302243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Relative Performance of HPV and Cytology Components of Cotesting in Cervical Screening.
Schiffman M; Kinney WK; Cheung LC; Gage JC; Fetterman B; Poitras NE; Lorey TS; Wentzensen N; Befano B; Schussler J; Katki HA; Castle PE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 May; 110(5):501-508. PubMed ID: 29145648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The impact of Jade Goody's diagnosis and death on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.
Lancucki L; Sasieni P; Patnick J; Day TJ; Vessey MP
J Med Screen; 2012 Jun; 19(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 22653575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Improving the uptake of cervical screening in pregnant and recently postnatal women: a quality improvement project.
Coleridge SL; Wiggans A; Nelissen E; Bethune R; Blackwell R; Bryant A; Morrison J
BMJ Open Qual; 2022 May; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 35613829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Knowledge and experience of a cohort of HIV-positive and HIV-negative Ghanaian women after undergoing human papillomavirus and cervical cancer screening.
Stuart A; Obiri-Yeboah D; Adu-Sarkodie Y; Hayfron-Benjamin A; Akorsu AD; Mayaud P
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Oct; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31647013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.
Zehbe I; Wakewich P; King AD; Morrisseau K; Tuck C
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(8):e017384. PubMed ID: 28864487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cervical cancer in women aged less than 25: East Kent experience.
Nair MS; Bhandari HM; Nordin AJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):706-8. PubMed ID: 17999298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme.
MacArthur GJ; Wright M; Beer H; Paranjothy S
J Med Screen; 2011; 18(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 22156146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Review of invasive cervical cancers and uptake of disclosure of results: an audit of procedures and response.
Prabakar I; Moss EL; Douce G; Parkes J; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2012 Jun; 23(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 22494343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Invasive cancer of the cervix in British Columbia: a review of the demography and screening histories of 437 cases seen from 1985-1988.
Anderson GH; Benedet JL; Le Riche JC; Matisic JP; Thompson JE
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 1603476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Invasive cancer of the cervix: does the UK National Health Service screening programme fail due to patients' non-attendance?
Clement KM; Mansour D
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 23589995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
