These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2359052)

  • 1. Female green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) do not selectively respond to signals with a harmonic structure in noise.
    Gerhardt HC; Allan S; Schwartz JJ
    J Comp Physiol A; 1990 Apr; 166(6):791-4. PubMed ID: 2359052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selectivity for harmonic structure in complex sounds by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea).
    Simmons AM
    J Comp Physiol A; 1988 Feb; 162(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 3351790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.
    Bee MA; Vélez A; Forester JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4188-95. PubMed ID: 22559390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues.
    Simmons AM; Buxbaum RC; Mirin MP
    J Comp Physiol A; 1993 Sep; 173(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 8229896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Signal recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) and Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) in naturally fluctuating noise.
    Vélez A; Bee MA
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 May; 127(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 23106802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.
    Ward JL; Buerkle NP; Bee MA
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():63-75. PubMed ID: 24055623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency selectivity of hearing in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea.
    Moss CF; Simmons AM
    J Comp Physiol A; 1986 Aug; 159(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 3761225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Kuczynski MC; Vélez A; Schwartz JJ; Bee MA
    J Exp Biol; 2010 Aug; 213(Pt 16):2840-50. PubMed ID: 20675554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.
    Vélez A; Höbel G; Gordon NM; Bee MA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2012 Dec; 198(12):891-904. PubMed ID: 23069882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs.
    Nityananda V; Bee MA
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):86-97. PubMed ID: 22240459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: the role of temporal structure and peripheral compression.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2759-70. PubMed ID: 12083211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of masker harmonicity on informational masking.
    Oh EL; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Aug; 108(2):706-9. PubMed ID: 10955637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mid-frequency suppression in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): mechanisms and implications for the evolution of acoustic communication.
    Gerhardt HC; Höbel G
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Aug; 191(8):707-14. PubMed ID: 15928971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27103. PubMed ID: 27345957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masked thresholds of auditory midbrain neurons in the frog Rana ridibunda.
    Joermann G
    Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 35(2-3):191-9. PubMed ID: 3198510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.