177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23590574)
21. Perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
He Y; Wu YM; Wang T; Song F; Wang Y; Zhu L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1237-42. PubMed ID: 23695508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Obstetric outcomes following LOOP-excision].
Baldauf JJ; Baulon E; Thoma V; Woronoff AS; Akladios CY
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Oct; 42(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 23809573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study.
Castanon A; Landy R; Brocklehurst P; Evans H; Peebles D; Singh N; Walker P; Patnick J; Sasieni P;
BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6223. PubMed ID: 25378384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A study of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women.
Yamazaki T; Inaba F; Takeda N; Huruno M; Kamemori T; Kousaka N; Ohta Y; Fukasawa I; Inaba N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Feb; 273(5):274-7. PubMed ID: 16362311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity.
Khalid S; Dimitriou E; Conroy R; Paraskevaidis E; Kyrgiou M; Harrity C; Arbyn M; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 22329499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.
Sadler L; Saftlas A; Wang W; Exeter M; Whittaker J; McCowan L
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2100-6. PubMed ID: 15126438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kyrgiou M; Athanasiou A; Paraskevaidi M; Mitra A; Kalliala I; Martin-Hirsch P; Arbyn M; Bennett P; Paraskevaidis E
BMJ; 2016 Jul; 354():i3633. PubMed ID: 27469988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the grade of CIN in colposcopically directed biopsies with that in outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens--a retrospective review.
Lee KE; Koh CF; Watt WF
Singapore Med J; 1999 Nov; 40(11):694-6. PubMed ID: 10709407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix.
Tan L; Pepra E; Haloob RK
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jan; 24(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 14675976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Conization in pregnancy and its significance for the further course of pregnancy].
Klein M; Rosen A; Vavra N; Gitsch G; Beck A
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Dec; 51(12):990-2. PubMed ID: 1794686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Natural History of Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Pregnancy and Mode of Delivery.
Schuster S; Joura E; Kohlberger P
Anticancer Res; 2018 Apr; 38(4):2439-2442. PubMed ID: 29599374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and risk for spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies.
Noehr B; Jensen A; Frederiksen K; Tabor A; Kjaer SK
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):511-515. PubMed ID: 19701028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth.
Jakobsson M; Gissler M; Paavonen J; Tapper AM
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):504-510. PubMed ID: 19701027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in diagnosis of cervical pathology at Srinagarind Hospital.
Ouitrakul S; Udomthavornsuk B; Chumworathayi B; Luanratanakorn S; Supoken A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(9):2451-3. PubMed ID: 22296400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Management of pregnant women with abnormal cervical smears. A series of 146 patients].
Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Gao J; Ritter J; Philippe E
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 8964955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.
Cohen PA; Brand A; Sykes P; Wrede DCH; McNally O; Eva L; Rao A; Campion M; Stockler M; Powell A; Codde J; Bulsara MK; Anderson L; Leung Y; Farrell L; Stoyles P
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017576. PubMed ID: 28851799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy.
LaPolla JP; O'Neill C; Wetrich D
J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 3361522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]