These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases. Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype. Leung TY; Vogel I; Lau TK; Chong W; Hyett JA; Petersen OB; Choy KW Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 38(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 21400624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole-genome array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses with major malformations and a normal karyotype. D'Amours G; Kibar Z; Mathonnet G; Fetni R; Tihy F; Désilets V; Nizard S; Michaud JL; Lemyre E Clin Genet; 2012 Feb; 81(2):128-41. PubMed ID: 21496010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal diagnosis using array-CGH: a French experience. Rooryck C; Toutain J; Cailley D; Bouron J; Horovitz J; Lacombe D; Arveiler B; Saura R Eur J Med Genet; 2013 Jul; 56(7):341-5. PubMed ID: 23454632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases. Scott F; Murphy K; Carey L; Greville W; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Robertson R; McLennan A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 23401365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with congenital heart disease. Yan Y; Wu Q; Zhang L; Wang X; Dan S; Deng D; Sun L; Yao L; Ma Y; Wang L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24323407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of chromosomal microarray in the evaluation of abnormal prenatal findings. Yatsenko SA; Davis S; Hendrix NW; Surti U; Emery S; Canavan T; Speer P; Hill L; Clemens M; Rajkovic A Clin Genet; 2013 Jul; 84(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 23020214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Applied research of combined G-banding and array-CGH in the prenatal diagnosis of ultrasonographic abnormalities in fetuses]. Fu W; Lu J; Xu L; Zheng L; Zhang Y; Zhong Y; Wang Y; Jin Y Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 31(6):737-42. PubMed ID: 25449078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on DNA from Amniotic Fluid and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Patel A Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1885():171-186. PubMed ID: 30506198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and comparison of chromosomal abnormality rate during second trimester]. Zhang YP; Wu JP; Li XT; Lei CX; Xu JZ; Yin M Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 46(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 22176986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Coppinger J; Alliman S; Lamb AN; Torchia BS; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG Prenat Diagn; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19795450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis study of 2782 cases of high-risk pregnant women. Zhang L; Zhang XH; Liang MY; Ren MH Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Feb; 123(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 20193481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing. Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prenatal chromosomal microarray testing of fetuses with ultrasound structural anomalies: A prospective cohort study of over 1000 consecutive cases. Chong HP; Hamilton S; Mone F; Cheung KW; Togneri FS; Morris RK; Quinlan-Jones E; Williams D; Allen S; McMullan DJ; Kilby MD Prenat Diagn; 2019 Nov; 39(12):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 31393021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]