209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23590786)
21. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates.
Fulkerson E; Koval K; Preston CF; Iesaka K; Kummer FJ; Egol KA
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Feb; 20(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 16462560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Effect of ultrasonic shock waves on the bone-bone cement interface].
Hach J; Benes A; Hani AB; Sosna A; Sunka P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 11759472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of bone-cement augmented Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blades in a polyurethane foam model with low density.
Sermon A; Boner V; Schwieger K; Boger A; Boonen S; Broos P; Richards G; Windolf M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 21824697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is augmentation a possible salvage procedure after lateral migration of the proximal femur nail antirotation?
Erhart S; Kammerlander C; El-Attal R; Schmoelz W
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Nov; 132(11):1577-81. PubMed ID: 22752458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
Digas G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.
Beaulé PE; Matar WY; Poitras P; Smit K; May O
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jan; 467(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 18923883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Enhancing proximal femoral pressure during cemented stem insertion.
Budnar VM; Bannister GC
Hip Int; 2012; 22(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 22740281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.
Hunt S; Stone C; Seal S
Can J Surg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21251430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Complications of cemented long-stem hip arthroplasties in metastatic bone disease.
Randall RL; Aoki SK; Olson PR; Bott SI
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Feb; 443():287-95. PubMed ID: 16462453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [ Improvement of femoral bone-cement adhesion in cemented revision hip arthroplasty by application of an amphiphilic bonder in a dynamic femur expulsion testing in vitro ].
Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Marx R; Mumme T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Dec; 52(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 18047404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision.
Mann KA; Ayers DC; Damron TA
J Orthop Res; 1997 Jan; 15(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 9066528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cement arteriovenogram after hip arthroplasty.
Garríguez-Pérez D; García-Coiradas J; Otero-Otero J; Marco-Martínez F
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed); 2020; 64(6):388-392. PubMed ID: 32807695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical evaluation of peri- and interprosthetic fractures of the femur.
Lehmann W; Rupprecht M; Hellmers N; Sellenschloh K; Briem D; Püschel K; Amling M; Morlock M; Rueger JM
J Trauma; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1459-63. PubMed ID: 20093986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing.
Little JP; Gray HA; Murray DW; Beard DJ; Gill HS
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18358388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
