These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23590842)

  • 1. Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous attention in touch.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Dec; 30(4):161-6. PubMed ID: 23590842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial orienting around the fovea: exogenous and endogenous cueing effects.
    Yang T; Zhang J; Bao Y
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():137-41. PubMed ID: 26232192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention.
    Spence C; McGlone FP
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 141(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 11715076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention effects on visuospatial working memory.
    Botta F; Santangelo V; Raffone A; Lupiáñez J; Belardinelli MO
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1590-602. PubMed ID: 20112160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.
    Chica AB; Sanabria D; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 17160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction between endogenous and exogenous orienting in crossmodal attention.
    Chen X; Chen Q; Gao D; Yue Z
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 22670628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-varying cortical activations related to visual-tactile cross-modal links in spatial selective attention.
    Kida T; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3585-96. PubMed ID: 17360823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maintenance of tactile short-term memory for locations is mediated by spatial attention.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 21925566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the nature and time-course of the modality shift effect between vision and touch.
    Miles E; Brown R; Poliakoff E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):871-88. PubMed ID: 20931419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Eimer M; Van Velzen J
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Jul; 39(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 12212636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space.
    Le Bigot N; Grosjean M
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):677-84. PubMed ID: 26134543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonspatial cueing of tactile STM causes shift of spatial attention.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 24(7):1596-609. PubMed ID: 22452555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP correlates of tactile spatial attention differ under intra- and intermodal conditions.
    Forster B; Sambo CF; Pavone EF
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 19665517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial attention and conscious perception: interactions and dissociations between and within endogenous and exogenous processes.
    Chica AB; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 22266110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When endogenous spatial attention improves conscious perception: effects of alerting and bottom-up activation.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Chica AB
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jan; 23():63-73. PubMed ID: 24368166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Mar; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15787854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.