These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23591148)

  • 1. Clinical outcome of repeat penetrating keratoplasty.
    Claesson M; Armitage WJ
    Cornea; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1026-30. PubMed ID: 23591148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential Survival of Penetrating and Lamellar Transplants in Management of Failed Corneal Grafts.
    Aboshiha J; Jones MNA; Hopkinson CL; Larkin DFP
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 136(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 29931227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Penetrating keratoplasty: outcomes from a corneal unit compared to national data.
    Beckingsale P; Mavrikakis I; Al-Yousuf N; Mavrikakis E; Daya SM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):728-31. PubMed ID: 16714264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Thompson RW; Price MO; Bowers PJ; Price FW
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Jul; 110(7):1396-402. PubMed ID: 12867398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study.
    Coster DJ; Lowe MT; Keane MC; Williams KA;
    Ophthalmology; 2014 May; 121(5):979-87. PubMed ID: 24491643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transplant rejection following endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom: incidence and survival.
    Figueiredo GS; Jones MN; Krishna Y; Figueiredo FC; Larkin DF; Kaye SB; ;
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 160(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 26116262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Third or greater penetrating keratoplasties: indications, survival, and visual outcomes.
    Yildiz EH; Hoskins E; Fram N; Rapuano CJ; Hammersmith KM; Laibson PR; Cohen EJ
    Cornea; 2010 Mar; 29(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20118784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of endothelial and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes following failed penetrating keratoplasty: a registry study.
    Keane MC; Galettis RA; Mills RA; Coster DJ; Williams KA;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 100(11):1569-1575. PubMed ID: 26892633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indications and outcome of repeat penetrating keratoplasty in India.
    Vanathi M; Sharma N; Sinha R; Tandon R; Titiyal JS; Vajpayee RB
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 5():26. PubMed ID: 16262912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeat penetrating corneal transplantation in patients with keratoconus.
    Kelly TL; Coster DJ; Williams KA
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Aug; 118(8):1538-42. PubMed ID: 21459452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indications for and outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty performed by resident surgeons.
    Randleman JB; Song CD; Palay DA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 12834672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrathin descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes.
    Busin M; Madi S; Santorum P; Scorcia V; Beltz J
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1186-94. PubMed ID: 23466268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Ang M; Lim F; Htoon HM; Tan D; Mehta JS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 100(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 26159453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Chronic endothelial cell loss of the graft after penetrating keratoplasty: influence of endothelial cell migration from graft to host].
    Reinhard T; Böhringer D; Hüschen D; Sundmacher R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Jun; 219(6):410-6. PubMed ID: 12136435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term Outcomes of Repeated Corneal Transplantations: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study.
    Dickman MM; Spekreijse LS; Dunker SL; Winkens B; Berendschot TTJM; van den Biggelaar FJHM; Kruit PJ; Nuijts RMMA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 193():156-165. PubMed ID: 29963996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in the indications for corneal graft surgery in the United Kingdom: 1999 through 2009.
    Keenan TD; Jones MN; Rushton S; Carley FM;
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 130(5):621-8. PubMed ID: 22652847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indications for and outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty, 1989-1995.
    Patel NP; Kim T; Rapuano CJ; Cohen EJ; Laibson PR
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Apr; 107(4):719-24. PubMed ID: 10768334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective review of graft dislocation rate associated with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after primary failed penetrating keratoplasty.
    Clements JL; Bouchard CS; Lee WB; Dunn SP; Mannis MJ; Reidy JJ; John T; Hannush SB; Goins KM; Wagoner MD; Adi MA; Rubenstein JB; Udell IJ; Babiuch AS
    Cornea; 2011 Apr; 30(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 21099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Long-term outcome after penetrating keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy - influence of preoperative visual acuity on final outcome].
    Reimer A; Langenbucher A; Cursiefen C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Feb; 229(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 22095151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Immunological graft reactions after penetrating keratoplasty - A prospective randomized trial comparing corneal excimer laser and motor trephination].
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Diamantis A; Cursiefen C; Küchle M; Naumann GO
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Nov; 218(11):710-9. PubMed ID: 11731898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.