1672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23591659)
1. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.
Phillips FM; Lee JY; Geisler FH; Cappuccino A; Chaput CD; DeVine JG; Reah C; Gilder KM; Howell KM; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E907-18. PubMed ID: 23591659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
Phillips FM; Geisler FH; Gilder KM; Reah C; Howell KM; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):674-83. PubMed ID: 25955086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.
Radcliff K; Coric D; Albert T
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 27015130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
Vaccaro A; Beutler W; Peppelman W; Marzluff JM; Highsmith J; Mugglin A; DeMuth G; Gudipally M; Baker KJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2227-39. PubMed ID: 24335629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
Singh K; Phillips FM; Park DK; Pelton MA; An HS; Goldberg EJ
Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial.
McAfee PC; Cappuccino A; Cunningham BW; Devine JG; Phillips FM; Regan JJ; Albert TJ; Ahrens JE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20051917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.
Gornet MF; Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Hodges SD; McConnell JR; Dryer RF; Copay AG; Nian H; Harrell FE
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):653-667. PubMed ID: 28304237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Loumeau TP; Darden BV; Kesman TJ; Odum SM; Van Doren BA; Laxer EB; Murrey DB
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2263-70. PubMed ID: 26869078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Contrastive analysis of neck axial symptoms after hybrid surgery or traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of two-level cervical disease].
Shen C; Shen Y; Ding W; Zhang Y; Cao J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 27(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 23427494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Sasso RC; Anderson PA; Riew KD; Heller JG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(18):1684-92. PubMed ID: 21938372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China.
Zhang X; Zhang X; Chen C; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Wang B; Yan W; Li M; Yuan W; Wang Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 21673620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
