208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23592183)
1. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
Thomson SJ; Watter S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm.
Janczyk M; Renas S; Durst M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):261-276. PubMed ID: 28557494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the dorsal medial frontal cortex in central processing limitation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Soutschek A; Taylor PC; Schubert T
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2447-55. PubMed ID: 27083589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance.
Janczyk M; Pfister R; Hommel B; Kunde W
Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 24747873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.
Ko YT; Miller J
Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23948390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Backward compatibility effects in younger and older adults.
Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F; Festini SB; Frazier K; Krimmer PJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1337-50. PubMed ID: 27146993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
Johnston JC; McCann RS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex.
Marois R; Larson JM; Chun MM; Shima D
Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):436-47. PubMed ID: 16283409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.
Mattes A; Tavera F; Ophey A; Roheger M; Gaschler R; Haider H
Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1529-1552. PubMed ID: 32335762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The source of dual-task limitations: serial or parallel processing of multiple response selections?
Han SW; Marois R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1395-405. PubMed ID: 23864266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.
Beste C; Yildiz A; Meissner TW; Wolf OT
Behav Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 252():260-5. PubMed ID: 23769959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-task backward compatibility effects are episodically mediated.
Giammarco M; Thomson SJ; Watter S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):520-41. PubMed ID: 26572914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
