These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23592183)

  • 21. Separating limits on preparation versus online processing in multitasking paradigms: Evidence for resource models.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 27808552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parallel response selection after callosotomy.
    Hazeltine E; Weinstein A; Ivry RB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 18004953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.
    Lien MC; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):212-38. PubMed ID: 12120784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1368-84. PubMed ID: 9988597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Processing two tasks with varying task order: central stage duration influences central processing order.
    Ruiz Fernández S; Leonhard T; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 21427007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ideomotor-compatible tasks partially escape dual-task interference in both young and elderly adults.
    Hartley AA; Seaman B; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Mar; 30(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25689613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Paelecke M; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):627-44. PubMed ID: 17563226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Processing order in dual-task situations: The "first-come, first-served" principle and the impact of task order instructions.
    Strobach T; Hendrich E; Kübler S; Müller H; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1785-1803. PubMed ID: 29978280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological examination of response-related interference while dual-tasking: is it motoric or attentional?
    Jung KH; Martin T; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 32020364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.
    Green C; Johnston JC; Ruthruff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1083-98. PubMed ID: 21517217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm.
    Magen H; Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):395-414. PubMed ID: 20364926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does the central bottleneck encompass voluntary selection of hedonically based choices?
    Pashler H; Harris CR; Nuechterlein KH
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 25116298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Asymmetric interference in concurrent time-to-contact estimation: Cousin or twin of the psychological refractory period effect?
    Baurès R; DeLucia PR; Olson M; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):698-711. PubMed ID: 27896708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Late backward effects in the refractory period paradigm: effects of Task 2 execution on Task 1 performance.
    Ruiz Fernández S; Ulrich R
    Psychol Res; 2010 Jul; 74(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 19855997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temporal discrimination of one's own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1806-16. PubMed ID: 27311578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.
    Bratzke D; Janczyk M
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):605-617. PubMed ID: 31974636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychophysiological measurement of backward response activation in the prioritized processing paradigm.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):941-953. PubMed ID: 28252986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. General cognitive ability and the psychological refractory period: individual differences in the mind's bottleneck.
    Lee JJ; Chabris CF
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1226-33. PubMed ID: 23744874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.