195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23592255)
1. Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review.
Rubin KH; Friis-Holmberg T; Hermann AP; Abrahamsen B; Brixen K
J Bone Miner Res; 2013 Aug; 28(8):1701-17. PubMed ID: 23592255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Beaudoin C; Moore L; Gagné M; Bessette L; Ste-Marie LG; Brown JP; Jean S
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Apr; 30(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30877348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of osteoporotic fracture risk prediction tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Marques A; Ferreira RJ; Santos E; Loza E; Carmona L; da Silva JA
Ann Rheum Dis; 2015 Nov; 74(11):1958-67. PubMed ID: 26248637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study.
Rubin KH; Abrahamsen B; Friis-Holmberg T; Hjelmborg JV; Bech M; Hermann AP; Barkmann R; Glüer CC; Brixen K
Bone; 2013 Sep; 56(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23669650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Chakhtoura M; Cauley JA; Chamoun N
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):397-424. PubMed ID: 28734709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.
Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of electronic and manual fracture risk assessment tools in screening elderly male US veterans at risk for osteoporosis.
Williams ST; Lawrence PT; Miller KL; Crook JL; LaFleur J; Cannon GW; Nelson RE
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Nov; 28(11):3107-3111. PubMed ID: 28756457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the validity of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment tools (IOF One Minute Test, SCORE, and FRAX) in postmenopausal Palestinian women.
Kharroubi A; Saba E; Ghannam I; Darwish H
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):6. PubMed ID: 28013446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS.
Adami G; Biffi A; Porcu G; Ronco R; Alvaro R; Bogini R; Caputi AP; Cianferotti L; Frediani B; Gatti D; Gonnelli S; Iolascon G; Lenzi A; Leone S; Migliaccio S; Nicoletti T; Paoletta M; Pennini A; Piccirilli E; Tarantino U; Brandi ML; Corrao G; Rossini M; Michieli R
J Endocrinol Invest; 2023 Nov; 46(11):2287-2297. PubMed ID: 37031450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personalized fracture risk assessment: where are we at?
Nguyen TV
Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Jul; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 33982611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting fracture risk in osteoporosis: the use of fracture prediction tools in an osteoporosis clinic population.
Aw D; Thain J; Ali A; Aung T; Chua WM; Sahota O; Weerasuriya N; Marshall L; Kearney F; Masud T
Postgrad Med J; 2016 May; 92(1087):267-70. PubMed ID: 26792635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased cortical porosity and reduced cortical thickness of the proximal femur are associated with nonvertebral fracture independent of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and Garvan estimates in postmenopausal women.
Kral R; Osima M; Borgen TT; Vestgaard R; Richardsen E; Bjørnerem Å
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185363. PubMed ID: 28945789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review.
Nayak S; Edwards DL; Saleh AA; Greenspan SL
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jan; 25(1):23-49. PubMed ID: 24105431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of FRAX in predicting the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures using the USA treatment thresholds: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jiang X; Gruner M; Trémollieres F; Pluskiewicz W; Sornay-Rendu E; Adamczyk P; Schnatz PF
Bone; 2017 Jun; 99():20-25. PubMed ID: 28274799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture prediction tools in diabetes.
Agarwal A; Leslie WD
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2022 Aug; 29(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 35749735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Fracture Prediction Tools in Individuals Without and With Early Chronic Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Analysis of CARTaGENE.
Desbiens LC; Sidibé A; Beaudoin C; Jean S; Mac-Way F
J Bone Miner Res; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 32022942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High fracture probability predicts fractures in a 4-year follow-up in women from the RAC-OST-POL study.
Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Czekajło A; Grzeszczak W; Drozdzowska B
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Dec; 26(12):2811-20. PubMed ID: 26168766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.
Lin J; Yang Y; Fei Q; Zhang X; Ma Z; Wang Q; Li J; Li D; Meng Q; Wang B
Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():461-9. PubMed ID: 27217730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between various fracture risk assessment tools.
Leslie WD; Lix LM
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jan; 25(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 23797847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
