262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23592539)
1. Comparative responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the DASH-JSSH questionnaires to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release.
Iwatsuki K; Nishikawa K; Chaki M; Sato A; Morita A; Hirata H
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2014 Feb; 39(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 23592539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of responsiveness of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument to surgical treatment with DASH, SF-36, and physical findings.
Uchiyama S; Imaeda T; Toh S; Kusunose K; Sawaizumi T; Wada T; Okinaga S; Nishida J; Omokawa S; ;
J Orthop Sci; 2007 May; 12(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 17530376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire.
Imaeda T; Toh S; Wada T; Uchiyama S; Okinaga S; Kusunose K; Sawaizumi T;
J Orthop Sci; 2006 May; 11(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 16721524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.
Gay RE; Amadio PC; Johnson JC
J Hand Surg Am; 2003 Mar; 28(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 12671856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery.
Kotsis SV; Chung KC
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jan; 30(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 15680560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative responsiveness of Japanese versions of the DASH and SF-36 questionnaires and physical measurement to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release.
Imaeda T; Hirata H; Toh S; Nakao Y; Nishida J; Ijichi M; Nagano A
Hand Surg; 2006; 11(1-2):27-33. PubMed ID: 17080525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument.
Imaeda T; Uchiyama S; Toh S; Wada T; Okinaga S; Sawaizumi T; Nishida J; Kusunose K; Omokawa S;
J Orthop Sci; 2007 Jan; 12(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 17260112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological responsiveness and quality of life (QuickDASH, CTSI) evaluation of surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome.
Itsubo T; Uchiyama S; Momose T; Yasutomi T; Imaeda T; Kato H
J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jan; 14(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19214683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in patients with chronic nonhand pain compared with those without chronic pain.
Follmar KE; Chetelat MD; Lifchez SD
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 37(8):1585-90. PubMed ID: 22763053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and responsiveness of the patient evaluation measure as an outcome measure for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Hobby JL; Watts C; Elliot D
J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Aug; 30(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 15936130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of validity, reliability, responsiveness and bias of three commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Bakhsh H; Ibrahim I; Khan W; Smitham P; Goddard N
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2012; 14(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 23043056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?
Greenslade JR; Mehta RL; Belward P; Warwick DJ
J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Apr; 29(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 15010164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Korean version of the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Cross cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness.
Kim JK; Lim HM
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2015 Feb; 40(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 25005562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire.
Imaeda T; Toh S; Nakao Y; Nishida J; Hirata H; Ijichi M; Kohri C; Nagano A;
J Orthop Sci; 2005 Jul; 10(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 16075166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery.
Gummesson C; Atroshi I; Ekdahl C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2003 Jun; 4():11. PubMed ID: 12809562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary on Asshein and Finsen. The DASH and the QuickDASH instruments. Normative values in the general population in Norway: and Iwatsuki et al. Comparative responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the DASH-JSSH to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release.
Hobby JL
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2014 Feb; 39(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 24448793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Choosing the most efficacious scoring method for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Yücel H; Seyithanoğlu H
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25803249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness of the Korean version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (K-DASH) after carpal tunnel release.
Jeon SH; Lee JH; Chung MS; Baek GH; Oh JH; Lee YH; Gong HS
Clin Orthop Surg; 2011 Jun; 3(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 21629476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relative responsiveness and construct validity of the Spanish version of the DASH instrument for outcomes assessment in open carpal tunnel release.
Rosales RS; Diez de la Lastra I; McCabe S; Ortega Martinez JI; Hidalgo YM
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Feb; 34(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 19091735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responsiveness of the Dutch version of the DASH as an outcome measure for carpal tunnel syndrome.
De Smet L; De Kesel R; Degreef I; Debeer P
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Feb; 32(1):74-6. PubMed ID: 17123674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
