BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

820 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23592805)

  • 1. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging.
    Choi YJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Kim SJ; Suh DC
    Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 23592805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combination of IVIM-DWI and 3D-ASL for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial.
    Liu ZC; Yan LF; Hu YC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Nan HY; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang W; Cui GB
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28143434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling; comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method.
    Cebeci H; Aydin O; Ozturk-Isik E; Gumus C; Inecikli F; Bekar A; Kocaeli H; Hakyemez B
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1914-9. PubMed ID: 25087109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiation of progressive disease from pseudoprogression using 3D PCASL and DSC perfusion MRI in patients with glioblastoma.
    Manning P; Daghighi S; Rajaratnam MK; Parthiban S; Bahrami N; Dale AM; Bolar D; Piccioni DE; McDonald CR; Farid N
    J Neurooncol; 2020 May; 147(3):681-690. PubMed ID: 32239431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regional and voxel-wise comparisons of blood flow measurements between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) in brain tumors.
    White CM; Pope WB; Zaw T; Qiao J; Naeini KM; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Wang JJ; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM
    J Neuroimaging; 2014; 24(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 22672084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percent change of perfusion skewness and kurtosis: a potential imaging biomarker for early treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas.
    Baek HJ; Kim HS; Kim N; Choi YJ; Kim YJ
    Radiology; 2012 Sep; 264(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 22771885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of pulsed-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging by histogram analysis in evaluation of glial tumors.
    Arisawa A; Watanabe Y; Tanaka H; Takahashi H; Matsuo C; Fujiwara T; Fujiwara M; Fujimoto Y; Tomiyama N
    Neuroradiology; 2018 Jun; 60(6):599-608. PubMed ID: 29705876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tumor recurrence versus treatment effects in glioma: A comparative study of three dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.
    Xu Q; Liu Q; Ge H; Ge X; Wu J; Qu J; Xu K
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9332. PubMed ID: 29390403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation between progression and pseudoprogresion by arterial spin labeling MRI in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
    Jovanovic M; Radenkovic S; Stosic-Opincal T; Lavrnic S; Gavrilovic S; Lazovic-Popovic B; Soldatovic I; Maksimovic R
    J BUON; 2017; 22(4):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 28952228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma treated with radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide: comparison study of standard and high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Chu HH; Choi SH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Yeom JA; Shin H; Jung SC; Lee AL; Yoon TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 23771912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic contrast enhanced T1 MRI perfusion differentiates pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma.
    Thomas AA; Arevalo-Perez J; Kaley T; Lyo J; Peck KK; Shi W; Zhang Z; Young RJ
    J Neurooncol; 2015 Oct; 125(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 26275367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease.
    Seeger A; Braun C; Skardelly M; Paulsen F; Schittenhelm J; Ernemann U; Bisdas S
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1557-65. PubMed ID: 24200483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perfusion MR imaging of enhancing brain tumors: Comparison of arterial spin labeling technique with dynamic susceptibility contrast technique.
    Soni N; Dhanota DPS; Kumar S; Jaiswal AK; Srivastava AK
    Neurol India; 2017; 65(5):1046-1052. PubMed ID: 28879895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of arterial transit time delays on the differentiation between tumor progression and pseudoprogression in glioblastoma by arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging.
    van Dorth D; Jiang FY; Schmitz-Abecassis B; Croese RJI; Taphoorn MJB; Smits M; Koekkoek JAF; Dirven L; de Bresser J; van Osch MJP
    NMR Biomed; 2024 Apr; ():e5166. PubMed ID: 38654579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastomas using the initial and final area under the curves ratio derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion MR imaging.
    Suh CH; Kim HS; Choi YJ; Kim N; Kim SJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Dec; 34(12):2278-86. PubMed ID: 23828115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric astrocytic tumor grading: comparison between arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI perfusion.
    Morana G; Tortora D; Staglianò S; Nozza P; Mascelli S; Severino M; Piatelli G; Consales A; Lequin M; Garrè ML; Rossi A
    Neuroradiology; 2018 Apr; 60(4):437-446. PubMed ID: 29453753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perfusion MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging) with different measurement approaches for the evaluation of blood flow and blood volume in human gliomas.
    Thomsen H; Steffensen E; Larsson EM
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22114021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uninterpretable Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Images in Patients with Post-Treatment Glioblastomas: Cross-Validation of Alternative Imaging Options.
    Heo YJ; Kim HS; Park JE; Choi CG; Kim SJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136380. PubMed ID: 26296086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glioblastoma treated with concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy: differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression with quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Yun TJ; Park CK; Kim TM; Lee SH; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH; Choi SH
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):830-40. PubMed ID: 25333475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging with gradient-echo and spin-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
    Wong AM; Yan FX; Liu HL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 23677620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.