These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23592963)

  • 1. A healthy fear of the unknown: perspectives on the interpretation of parameter fits from computational models in neuroscience.
    Nassar MR; Gold JI
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013 Apr; 9(4):e1003015. PubMed ID: 23592963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting the importance of model fitting for model-based fMRI: It does matter in computational psychiatry.
    Katahira K; Toyama A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1008738. PubMed ID: 33561125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interpretation of computational model parameters depends on the context.
    Eckstein MK; Master SL; Xia L; Dahl RE; Wilbrecht L; Collins AGE
    Elife; 2022 Nov; 11():. PubMed ID: 36331872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data.
    Wilson RC; Collins AG
    Elife; 2019 Nov; 8():. PubMed ID: 31769410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls.
    van den Bos W; Bruckner R; Nassar MR; Mata R; Eppinger B
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 33():42-53. PubMed ID: 29066078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint modeling of reaction times and choice improves parameter identifiability in reinforcement learning models.
    Ballard IC; McClure SM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Apr; 317():37-44. PubMed ID: 30664916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational psychiatry.
    Montague PR; Dolan RJ; Friston KJ; Dayan P
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 16(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22177032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hierarchically organized behavior and its neural foundations: a reinforcement learning perspective.
    Botvinick MM; Niv Y; Barto AG
    Cognition; 2009 Dec; 113(3):262-280. PubMed ID: 18926527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Divide et impera: subgoaling reduces the complexity of probabilistic inference and problem solving.
    Maisto D; Donnarumma F; Pezzulo G
    J R Soc Interface; 2015 Mar; 12(104):20141335. PubMed ID: 25652466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A flexible and generalizable model of online latent-state learning.
    Cochran AL; Cisler JM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Sep; 15(9):e1007331. PubMed ID: 31525176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimisation of an exemplar oculomotor model using multi-objective genetic algorithms executed on a GPU-CPU combination.
    Avramidis E; Akman OE
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Mar; 11(1):40. PubMed ID: 28340582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized attention-weighted reinforcement learning.
    Bramlage L; Cortese A
    Neural Netw; 2022 Jan; 145():10-21. PubMed ID: 34710787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational optimization of associative learning experiments.
    Melinscak F; Bach DR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Jan; 16(1):e1007593. PubMed ID: 31905214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interpretation of behavior-model correlations in unidentified cognitive models.
    van Maanen L; Miletić S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):374-383. PubMed ID: 32767046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain.
    Dayan P; Daw ND
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 8(4):429-53. PubMed ID: 19033240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive coordination of working-memory and reinforcement learning in non-human primates performing a trial-and-error problem solving task.
    Viejo G; Girard B; Procyk E; Khamassi M
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 355():76-89. PubMed ID: 29061387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SEM of another flavour: two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm.
    Cai L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):309-29. PubMed ID: 17971266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to fit a response time distribution.
    Van Zandt T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):424-65. PubMed ID: 11082851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How can a Bayesian approach inform neuroscience?
    O'Reilly JX; Jbabdi S; Behrens TE
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 35(7):1169-79. PubMed ID: 22487045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring neural circuit structure from datasets of heterogeneous tuning curves.
    Arakaki T; Barello G; Ahmadian Y
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Apr; 15(4):e1006816. PubMed ID: 31002660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.