These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23593154)

  • 1. Use of trial register information during the peer review process.
    Mathieu S; Chan AW; Ravaud P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e59910. PubMed ID: 23593154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials.
    Hopewell S; Witt CM; Linde K; Icke K; Adedire O; Kirtley S; Altman DG
    Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 29325598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
    Jones CW; Adams A; Weaver MA; Schroter S; Misemer BS; Schriger D; Platts-Mills TF
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(5):e028694. PubMed ID: 31154313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors.
    Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Molenaar N; Bossuyt PM; Scholten RJ
    Neth J Med; 2014 Sep; 72(7):349-55. PubMed ID: 25178768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
    Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.
    Almquist M; von Allmen RS; Carradice D; Oosterling SJ; McFarlane K; Wijnhoven B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179031. PubMed ID: 28662046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time to ensure that clinical trial appropriate results are actually published.
    Dal-Ré R; Caplan AL
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 70(4):491-3. PubMed ID: 24413686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".
    Vinther S; Nielsen OH; Rosenberg J; Keiding N; Schroeder TV
    Dan Med J; 2012 Aug; 59(8):A4479. PubMed ID: 22849979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
    Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey.
    Grossetta Nardini HK; Batten J; Funaro MC; Garcia-Milian R; Nyhan K; Spak JM; Wang L; Glover JG
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2019; 4():23. PubMed ID: 31798974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compliance with trial registration in five core journals of clinical geriatrics: a survey of original publications on randomised controlled trials from 2008 to 2012.
    Mann E; Nguyen N; Fleischer S; Meyer G
    Age Ageing; 2014 Nov; 43(6):872-6. PubMed ID: 24982096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Definitions of blinding in randomised controlled trials of interventions published in high-impact anaesthesiology journals: a methodological study and survey of authors.
    Penić A; Begić D; Balajić K; Kowalski M; Marušić A; Puljak L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Apr; 10(4):e035168. PubMed ID: 32284390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Moher D; Schriger D; Hopewell S; Shanahan D; Alam S; Baron G; Regnaux JP; Crequit P; Martinez V; Riveros C; Le Cleach L; Recchioni A; Altman DG; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2019 Nov; 17(1):205. PubMed ID: 31744489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.
    Glonti K; Cauchi D; Cobo E; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMC Med; 2019 Jun; 17(1):118. PubMed ID: 31217033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals.
    Shattell MM; Chinn P; Thomas SP; Cowling WR
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Mar; 42(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 20487187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrepancy review: a feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications.
    TARG Meta-Research Group and Collaborators
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Jul; 9(7):220142. PubMed ID: 35911195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e035600. PubMed ID: 32792429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Consistency Between Peer-Reviewed Publications and Clinical Trial Registries.
    Sun LW; Lee DJ; Collins JA; Carll TC; Ramahi K; Sandy SJ; Unteriner JG; Weinberg DV
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 137(5):552-556. PubMed ID: 30946427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
    Rongen JJ; Hannink G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.