189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23593200)
1. Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Richter L; Neumann G; Oung S; Schweikard A; Trillenberg P
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60358. PubMed ID: 23593200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atlas of optimal coil orientation and position for TMS: A computational study.
Gomez-Tames J; Hamasaka A; Laakso I; Hirata A; Ugawa Y
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(4):839-848. PubMed ID: 29699821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by navigated mapping of optimal TMS current directions in healthy subjects.
Bashir S; Perez JM; Horvath JC; Pascual-Leone A
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Aug; 30(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 23912579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. H-coil: Induced electric field properties and input/output curves on healthy volunteers, comparison with a standard figure-of-eight coil.
Fadini T; Matthäus L; Rothkegel H; Sommer M; Tergau F; Schweikard A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 120(6):1174-82. PubMed ID: 19433366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of TMS coil orientation on the spatial distribution of motor evoked potentials in an intrinsic hand muscle.
Souza VH; Vieira TM; Peres ASC; Garcia MAC; Vargas CD; Baffa O
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2018 Nov; 63(6):635-645. PubMed ID: 28796636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Stokes MG; Chambers CD; Gould IC; English T; McNaught E; McDonald O; Mattingley JB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul; 118(7):1617-25. PubMed ID: 17524764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulating deep cortical structures with the batwing coil: how to determine the intensity for transcranial magnetic stimulation using coil-cortex distance.
Cai W; George JS; Chambers CD; Stokes MG; Verbruggen F; Aron AR
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 204(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 22138632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel low-cost approach for navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Rodseth J; Washabaugh EP; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2017; 35(6):601-609. PubMed ID: 29036851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of motor imagery, movement and coil orientation.
Niyazov DM; Butler AJ; Kadah YM; Epstein CM; Hu XP
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1601-10. PubMed ID: 15953559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of "standard" and "navigated" procedures of TMS coil positioning over motor, premotor and prefrontal targets in patients with chronic pain and depression.
Ahdab R; Ayache SS; Brugières P; Goujon C; Lefaucheur JP
Neurophysiol Clin; 2010 Mar; 40(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20230933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New coil positioning method for interleaved transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)/functional MRI (fMRI) and its validation in a motor cortex study.
Moisa M; Pohmann R; Ewald L; Thielscher A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 19097080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas.
Janssen AM; Oostendorp TF; Stegeman DF
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():47. PubMed ID: 25981522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation of stimulation intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation with depth.
Trillenberg P; Bremer S; Oung S; Erdmann C; Schweikard A; Richter L
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Nov; 211(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 23000723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The precise adjustment of coil location for transcranial magnetic stimulation during dynamic motion.
Kitamura T; Yaeshima K; Yamamoto S; Kawashima N
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3578-81. PubMed ID: 24110503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of coil-skull distance on transcranial magnetic stimulation motor-evoked responses.
Cukic M; Kalauzi A; Ilic T; Miskovic M; Ljubisavljevic M
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 18787813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Dubach P; Guggisberg AG; Rösler KM; Hess CW; Mathis J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):862-70. PubMed ID: 15003767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue: clinical impact on focality, reproducibility and true sham stimulation.
Toschi N; Welt T; Guerrisi M; Keck ME
J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Jan; 43(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 18514227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials.
Jung NH; Delvendahl I; Kuhnke NG; Hauschke D; Stolle S; Mall V
Brain Stimul; 2010 Apr; 3(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 20633437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of coil placement and orientation on the assessment of focal excitability in motor mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Reijonen J; Säisänen L; Könönen M; Mohammadi A; Julkunen P
J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Feb; 331():108521. PubMed ID: 31733284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motor evoked potentials from masseter muscle induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pyramidal tract: the importance of coil orientation.
Guggisberg AG; Dubach P; Hess CW; Wüthrich C; Mathis J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 112(12):2312-9. PubMed ID: 11738204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
