These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23594162)

  • 1. Multiple high lead impedances in an implantable-cardioverter defibrillator system: what is the mechanism?
    Ho RT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Sep; 36(9):1173-5. PubMed ID: 23594162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implantable cardiac defibrillator lead failure or myopotential oversensing? An approach to the diagnosis of noise on lead electrograms.
    Kowalski M; Ellenbogen KA; Wood MA; Friedman PL
    Europace; 2008 Aug; 10(8):914-7. PubMed ID: 18565976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Non-functional lead as a cause of detection disturbances in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator].
    Kempa M; Budrejko S; Nowakowski M; Królak T; Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz L; Raczak G
    Kardiol Pol; 2012; 70(10):1073-5. PubMed ID: 23080104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic R-wave and impedance testing with the modern patient alert system to reduce inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks due to lead fracture.
    Chinushi M; Hosaka Y; Ikarashi N; Iijima K; Furushima H; Aizawa Y
    Europace; 2008 Jun; 10(6):738-40. PubMed ID: 18390874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple ICD discharges associated with lead fracture without triggering of high impedance alert.
    Donaldson DM; Singh JP; Heist EK; Mela T; Ruskin JN; Das S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Apr; 32(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 19335867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early automatic remote detection of combined lead insulation defect and ICD damage.
    Neuzil P; Taborsky M; Holy F; Wallbrueck K
    Europace; 2008 May; 10(5):556-7. PubMed ID: 18227352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rise in ICD shock impedance: lead fracture or death?
    Stroobandt RX; Van Heuverswyn FE; Kucher A; Barold SS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Sep; 35(9):1103-10. PubMed ID: 22734696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of implantable defibrillator longevity under clinical circumstances: implications for device selection.
    Knops P; Theuns DA; Res JC; Jordaens L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Oct; 32(10):1276-85. PubMed ID: 19796344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Isolated and Transient Lead Impedance Alert as the Sole Indicator of ICD System Failure.
    Whittaker-Axon S; Breitenstein A; Finlay M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Sep; 39(9):1022-5. PubMed ID: 27119619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limitation of programmed alerts to predict ICD lead failures.
    Vlay SC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Apr; 32(4):554-5. PubMed ID: 19335870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tools and strategies for the reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks.
    Tzeis S; Andrikopoulos G; Kolb C; Vardas PE
    Europace; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1256-65. PubMed ID: 18708639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Near-Fatal ICD Lead Dysfunction with Implications for ICD Testing.
    Wutzler A; Attanasio P; Haverkamp W; Blaschke F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Jan; 39(1):105-6. PubMed ID: 26519249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: principles, progress, and promises.
    Haqqani HM; Mond HG
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Oct; 32(10):1336-53. PubMed ID: 19796348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of pacing/defibrillator lead failure using device diagnostics and pacing maneuvers.
    Chung EH; Casavant D; John RM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Apr; 32(4):547-9. PubMed ID: 19335868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impedance changes on defibrillation coils after atrial fibrillation ablation: lead damage or electromechanical interference?
    Vanga SR; Bommana S; Kroll M; Lakkireddy D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 35(6):e163-6. PubMed ID: 21029124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Terminology, characterization, and measurement of ICD defibrillation impedance.
    Barold SS; Herweg B
    J Electrocardiol; 2013; 46(6):660-2. PubMed ID: 24075508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Cold can for a hot case": use of a coronary sinus shocking lead in association with cold can to achieve successful defibrillation.
    Hamid S; Khan S; Rinaldi CA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Apr; 32(4):561-2. PubMed ID: 19335872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Myopotentials leading to ventricular fibrillation detection after advisory defibrillator generator replacement.
    Eckart RE; Hruczkowski TW; Stevenson WG; Epstein LM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1273-6. PubMed ID: 17100683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical experience and procedural outcomes associated with the DF4 implantable cardioverter defibrillator system: the SJ4 postapproval study.
    Cantillon DJ; Ha K; Styperek R; Jumrussirikul P; Mirro M; Wong W; Wilkoff BL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Jul; 36(7):855-62. PubMed ID: 23617316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of >10 years.
    Kleemann T; Becker T; Doenges K; Vater M; Senges J; Schneider S; Saggau W; Weisse U; Seidl K
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(19):2474-80. PubMed ID: 17470696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.