These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23594261)

  • 21. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct.
    Aubert Bonn N; Godecharle S; Dierickx K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 28220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the preparedness of research integrity officers (RIOs) to appropriately handle possible research misconduct cases.
    Bonito AJ; Titus SL; Wright DE
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Dec; 18(4):605-19. PubMed ID: 21647595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity.
    Bouter L
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Aug; 26(4):2363-2369. PubMed ID: 31965429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of culture in research misconduct.
    Davis MS
    Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries.
    de Vries J; Munung SN; Matimba A; McCurdy S; Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer O; Staunton C; Yakubu A; Tindana P;
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28153006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Research integrity in China: problems and prospects.
    Zeng W; Resnik D
    Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 19832885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):302-319. PubMed ID: 32613889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An international study of research misconduct policies.
    Resnik DB; Rasmussen LM; Kissling GE
    Account Res; 2015; 22(5):249-66. PubMed ID: 25928177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The present situation of and challenges in research ethics and integrity promotion: Experiences in East Asia.
    Chou C; Lee IJ; Fudano J
    Account Res; 2024 Aug; 31(6):576-599. PubMed ID: 36641764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Collecting and characterizing existing and freely accessible research integrity educational resources.
    Pizzolato D; Abdi S; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2020 May; 27(4):195-211. PubMed ID: 32122167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating U.S. medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures.
    Titus SL
    Account Res; 2014; 21(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 24073604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Canadian policy on reporting breaches of research integrity: When should Research Ethics Boards be informed?
    Page SA; Stalker MA
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):460-471. PubMed ID: 31462108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
    Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
    J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emphasizing the experiences of researchers after RCR instructions: Introduction to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) in Malaysia.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z; Ibrahim M
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):157-175. PubMed ID: 30982340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct.
    Nouchi R; Aihara H; Arie F; Asashima M; Daida H; Fudano J; Fujiwara Y; Fushiki S; Geller RJ; Hatano K; Homma T; Kimura M; Kuroki T; Miki K; Morita I; Nitta K; Shinohara A; Siomi MC; Yoshida M; Ichikawa I
    Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):327-346. PubMed ID: 32223327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The integrity of science - lost in translation?
    Kaiser M
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 24810194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1755-1776. PubMed ID: 29249021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research].
    Klasen EC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(35):1622-4. PubMed ID: 12233155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scientific dishonesty--a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway.
    Hofmann B; Myhr AI; Holm S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Jan; 14():3. PubMed ID: 23289954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.