These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23595079)

  • 1. An important contribution to our understanding of the performance of the current generation of metal-on-metal hip replacements.
    Jacobs JJ; Wimmer MA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 95(8):e53. PubMed ID: 23595079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: going, going, gone... - affirms.
    Berend KR; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Lombardi AV
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):75-7. PubMed ID: 23118387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which factors determine the wear rate of large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements? Multivariate analysis of two hundred and seventy-six components.
    Hart AJ; Muirhead-Allwood S; Porter M; Matthies A; Ilo K; Maggiore P; Underwood R; Cann P; Cobb J; Skinner JA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 95(8):678-85. PubMed ID: 23595065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metal-on-metal hip replacement: a new concept for an old problem?
    Segal O; Maoz-Segal R
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2013 Nov; 15(11):722-4. PubMed ID: 24511659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current concepts in hip arthroplasty imaging: metal-on-metal prostheses, their complications, and imaging strategies.
    Bestic JM; Berquist TH
    Semin Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 23452465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris.
    Matharu GS; Eskelinen A; Judge A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
    Acta Orthop; 2018 Jun; 89(3):278-288. PubMed ID: 29493348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Catastrophic failure due to massive osteolysis of both acetabular and femoral components in a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a demonstrative case report.
    Gutman G; Hershkovich O; Amit Y; Israeli A
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Nov; 23 Suppl 2():S225-8. PubMed ID: 23412220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: going, going, gone... - opposes.
    Benjamin-Laing H; Haddad FS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):78-81. PubMed ID: 23118388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty].
    Ulrich M; Overgaard S; Penny J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2014; 176(34):. PubMed ID: 25293565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pearls: Removing Modular Metal-on-Metal Liners using a Battery-powered Handheld Impaction System.
    Kaplan N; Neumaier M; Ricciardi BF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Mar; 479(3):463-465. PubMed ID: 33577210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pleomorphic clinical spectrum of metallosis in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pisanu F; Doria C; Andreozzi M; Bartoli M; Saderi L; Sotgiu G; Tranquilli Leali P
    Int Orthop; 2019 Jan; 43(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 30269183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
    Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meeting the demands of on-going metal-on-metal hip surveillance through nurse led services.
    Elliott S; Langfield S
    Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs; 2016 Feb; 20():40-4. PubMed ID: 26772766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taper-Trunnion Interface Stress Varies Significantly With Head Size and Activity.
    Norman TL; Denen JE; Land AJ; Kienitz DM; Fehring TA
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jan; 34(1):157-162. PubMed ID: 30318251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.
    Matharu GS; Nandra RS; Berryman F; Judge A; Pynsent PB; Dunlop DJ
    Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 28455467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CORR Insights(®): Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.
    Argenson JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 26349441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Beverland DE; Spencer RF
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(3):277-8. PubMed ID: 21698573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision of ASR hip arthroplasty: analysis of two hundred and ninety six recalled patients at seven years.
    Benelli G; Maritato M; Cerulli Mariani P; Sasso F
    Int Orthop; 2019 Jan; 43(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 30194652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision rates for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty - a systematic review.
    Ras Sørensen SL; Jørgensen HL; Sporing SL; Lauritzen JB
    Hip Int; 2016 Nov; 26(6):515-521. PubMed ID: 27791245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hip resurfacing and pseudotumour.
    Murray DW; Grammatopoulos G; Gundle R; Gibbons CL; Whitwell D; Taylor A; Glyn-Jones S; Pandit HG; Ostlere S; Gill HS; Athanasou N; McLardy-Smith P
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 21698574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.