These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23595621)

  • 1. Quality of bitewing radiographs in children in relation to the type of film holder used.
    Herman HD; Ashkenazi M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23595621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric bitewing film holder: preschoolers' acceptance and radiographs' diagnostic quality.
    Pierro VS; Barcelos R; de Souza IP; Raymundo RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 18767515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bitewing film quality: a clinical comparison of the loop vs. holder techniques.
    Kositbowornchai S; Phadannorg T; Permpoonsinsook M; Thinkhamrop B
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15119720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial development and in vitro evaluation of the HPL device for obtaining reproducible bitewing radiographs of children.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 May; 71(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 2047107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of bitewing radiography on estimates of dental caries experience among children differs according to their disease experience.
    Foster Page LA; Boyd D; Fuge K; Stevenson A; Goad K; Sim D; Thomson WM
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):137. PubMed ID: 30092796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility and overlapping of bitewing radiographs: comparison of Eggen-bite with Kwik-bite.
    Möystad A; Larheim TA
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1989 Apr; 17(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 2920541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of a Newly Designed Film Holder for Premolar Bitewing Radiography.
    Safi Y; Esmaeelinejad M; Vasegh Z; Valizadeh S; Aghdasi MM; Sarani O; Afsahi M
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Nov; 9(11):TC04-7. PubMed ID: 26675339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP-ORA: a three-function dental X-ray film positioning device for taking anterior and posterior periapical and bitewing intraoral radiographs.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(3):38-40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 21739876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can nonstandardized bitewing radiographs be used to assess the presence of alveolar bone loss in epidemiologic studies?
    Merchant AT; Pitiphat W; Parker J; Joshipura K; Kellerman M; Douglass CW
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 32(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 15239778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.
    Parrott LA; Ng SY
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21239573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow.
    Taylor GK; Macpherson LM
    Br Dent J; 2004 May; 196(9):563-8; discussion 541. PubMed ID: 15131628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of bitewing radiographs in 5-year-old children.
    Holt RD; Abdulkarim NT; Rule DC
    Community Dent Health; 1990 Dec; 7(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 2292069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of two new image receptor-holding devices for overlapping reduction of proximal surfaces in bitewing radiography: a preclinical study.
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Gaêta-Araujo H; Peroni LV; Oliveira-Santos C; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 May; 50(4):20200449. PubMed ID: 33353388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of dentine caries using the oblique lateral radiograph.
    Townsend D
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2000 Jun; 10(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11310099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the diagnostic advantage of intraoral D and E film for detecting interproximal caries.
    Ardakani FE; Davari A; Goodarzipour D; Goodarzipour K; Fallahzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):58-70. PubMed ID: 15558091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography.
    Kaffe I; Gordon M; Laufer B; Littner MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 May; 57(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 6587305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
    Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds.
    Ricketts DN; Whaites EJ; Kidd EA; Brown JE; Wilson RF
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jan; 182(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 9033139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.