267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23596850)
1. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
Doyon F; Hill C
J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Bossuyt PM
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):713-4. PubMed ID: 18710968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Critical review of a paper addressing the assessment of a diagnostic procedure].
François P; Labarère J
Rev Prat; 2010 Nov; 60(9):1278-80. PubMed ID: 21328867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The Danish clinical guidelines (Klaringsrapporter, 1996-2001: Insufficient evidence presented for the diagnostic accuracy of recommended clinical-biochemical tests].
Jørgensen PE; Madsen JS; Jørgensen LG; Larsen TB; Hilden J; Magid E
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1667-70. PubMed ID: 15174403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A research primer, Part 2: Guidelines for developing a research project.
Yens DP; Brannan GD; Dumsha JZ
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Jan; 114(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 24384972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do we need a checklist for reporting the results of diagnostic test evaluations? The STARD proposal.
Gatsonis C
Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):599-600. PubMed ID: 12809411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostics: new methodological initiatives].
Magid E; Jørgensen PE; Jørgensen LG; Madsen JS; Larsen TB; Hilden J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1664-6. PubMed ID: 15174402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Importance of scientific research design to improve the quality of clinical study].
Wang J
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 1999 Jun; 22(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 11775817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Discussion of Keiding.
Peng RD
Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):393-4. PubMed ID: 20538876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated.
Van den Bruel A; Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 16713517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 119(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12520693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; De Vet HC;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 12818829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.
Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The evaluation of the methodology in studies about diagnostic test in "Anales Española de Pediatria"].
González de Dios J
An Esp Pediatr; 1999 Nov; 51(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 10652795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How to conduct a high-quality original study on a diagnostic research topic.
Yao X; Vella E
Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 26(3):305-309. PubMed ID: 28807251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of composite reference standards in diagnostic research.
Naaktgeboren CA; Bertens LC; van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5605. PubMed ID: 24162938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
