These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23596850)

  • 21. [Roaming through methodology. X. The testing of diagnostic procedures].
    Bossuyt PM; Lijmer JG; Mol BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(43):2345-7. PubMed ID: 9864513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Methodology of diagnostic validation studies. Errors in planning and analysis].
    Jensen K; Abel U
    Med Klin (Munich); 1999 Sep; 94(9):522-9. PubMed ID: 10544616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Pai M; Sharma S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnston KC; Holloway RG
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three principles to define the success of a diagnostic study could be identified.
    Vach W; Gerke O; Høilund-Carlsen PF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 21995974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process.
    Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):481-2. PubMed ID: 16477059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening].
    Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S
    Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Test accuracy and potential sources of bias in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Bell KJ; Macaskill P; Loy C
    Med J Aust; 2020 Jan; 212(1):10-13.e1. PubMed ID: 31851371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
    Moons KG; van der Graaf Y
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(26):1256-61. PubMed ID: 10908955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Moons KG; Harrell FE
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 12809422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
    Heddle NM; Ness P
    Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Design and analysis of a study on reliability and validity of diagnostic tests in urological clinical research].
    Fernández Pérez C; Moreno Sierra J; Barreales Tolosa L; Ramírez de Molina V
    Arch Esp Urol; 2003; 56(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 12958999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [How to use the STARD statement and the QUADAS-2 tool?].
    Cohen J; Bossuyt P; Levy C; Chalumeau M; Martinot A; Launay E
    Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):190-1. PubMed ID: 26112586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methodological and analytic considerations for blood biomarkers.
    Christenson RH; Duh SH
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2012; 55(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 22824107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reporting guidelines and quality research.
    Sanders R
    J Orthop Trauma; 2015 May; 29(5):209. PubMed ID: 25900748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Various randomized designs can be used to evaluate medical tests.
    Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 18945590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
    Kleijnen J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    McQueen M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):1. PubMed ID: 12636041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.