177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23596950)
21. Nanofiltration processes applied to the removal of phenyl-ureas in natural waters.
Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Real FJ; García C
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jun; 165(1-3):714-23. PubMed ID: 19054613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal.
Sato Y; Kang M; Kamei T; Magara Y
Water Res; 2002 Jul; 36(13):3371-7. PubMed ID: 12188137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Removal of glyphosate in neutralization liquor from the glycine-dimethylphosphit process by nanofiltration.
Xie M; Liu Z; Xu Y
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Sep; 181(1-3):975-80. PubMed ID: 20554387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
Bellona C; Drewes JE
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of organic matter on arsenic removal during coagulation/flocculation treatment.
Pallier V; Feuillade-Cathalifaud G; Serpaud B; Bollinger JC
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2010 Feb; 342(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 19906383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nanofiltration and granular activated carbon treatment of perfluoroalkyl acids.
Appleman TD; Dickenson ER; Bellona C; Higgins CP
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():740-6. PubMed ID: 23846124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Achieving low concentrations of chromium in drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane performance and selection.
Giagnorio M; Ruffino B; Grinic D; Steffenino S; Meucci L; Zanetti MC; Tiraferri A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):25294-25305. PubMed ID: 29946838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of humic acid on arsenic(V) removal by zero-valent iron from groundwater with special references to corrosion products analyses.
Rao P; Mak MS; Liu T; Lai KC; Lo IM
Chemosphere; 2009 Apr; 75(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 19157491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nitrate removal from groundwater using negatively charged nanofiltration membrane.
Zou L; Zhang S; Liu J; Cao Y; Qian G; Li YY; Xu ZP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34197-34204. PubMed ID: 30515691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A nanofiltration-coagulation integrated system for separation and stabilization of arsenic from groundwater.
Pal P; Chakrabortty S; Linnanen L
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Apr; 476-477():601-10. PubMed ID: 24496033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Removal of small trihalomethane precursors from aqueous solution by nanofiltration.
Lin YL; Chiang PC; Chang EE
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):20-9. PubMed ID: 17212977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influences of solution chemistry and polymeric natural organic matter on the removal of aquatic pharmaceutical residuals by nanofiltration.
Zazouli MA; Susanto H; Nasseri S; Ulbricht M
Water Res; 2009 Jul; 43(13):3270-80. PubMed ID: 19520413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The negative rejection of H+ in NF of carbonate solution and its influences on membrane performance.
Zhu A; Long F; Wang X; Zhu W; Ma J
Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1558-65. PubMed ID: 17250866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Arsenic removal from groundwater by MnO2-modified natural clinoptilolite zeolite: effects of pH and initial feed concentration.
Camacho LM; Parra RR; Deng S
J Hazard Mater; 2011 May; 189(1-2):286-93. PubMed ID: 21398033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Removal of phenol from coke-oven wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration membranes.
Kumar R; Pal P
Water Environ Res; 2013 May; 85(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 23789574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
