BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23596961)

  • 1. Mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas by modified fly ash.
    Xu W; Wang H; Zhu T; Kuang J; Jing P
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 23596961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas by pyrite-modified fly ash adsorbent.
    Qi L; Wang X; Wang W; Li J; Huang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(26):39228-39238. PubMed ID: 35099696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Possibilities of mercury removal in the dry flue gas cleaning lines of solid waste incineration units.
    Svoboda K; Hartman M; Šyc M; Pohořelý M; Kameníková P; Jeremiáš M; Durda T
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():499-511. PubMed ID: 26588812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regenerable cobalt oxide loaded magnetosphere catalyst from fly ash for mercury removal in coal combustion flue gas.
    Yang J; Zhao Y; Zhang J; Zheng C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14837-43. PubMed ID: 25403026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of coal-fired power plants.
    Liu SH; Yan NQ; Liu ZR; Qu Z; Wang HP; Chang SG; Miller C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(4):1405-12. PubMed ID: 17593749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gas-phase elemental mercury removal from flue gas by cobalt-modified fly ash at low temperatures.
    Xu Y; Zhong Q; Xing L
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(21-24):2870-7. PubMed ID: 25176492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface modification of fly ash by non-thermal air plasma for elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas.
    Shi M; Luo G; Zhu H; Zou R; Hu J; Xu Y; Yao H
    Environ Technol; 2021 Jan; 42(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 31169458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of selective catalytic reduction impact on mercury speciation under simulated NOx emission control conditions.
    Lee CW; Srivastava RK; Ghorishi SB; Hastings TW; Stevens FM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Dec; 54(12):1560-6. PubMed ID: 15648394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mitigation of gaseous mercury emissions from waste-to-energy facilities: Homogeneous and heterogeneous Hg-oxidation pathways in presence of fly ashes.
    Rumayor M; Svoboda K; Švehla J; Pohořelý M; Šyc M
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():276-283. PubMed ID: 29096141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distribution of mercury in the combustion products from coal-fired power plants in Guizhou, southwest China.
    Liu S; Chen J; Cao Y; Yang H; Chen C; Jia W
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(2):234-245. PubMed ID: 30396327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mercury oxidation promoted by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst under simulated Powder River Basin coal combustion conditions.
    Lee CW; Serre SD; Zhao Y; Lee SJ; Hastings TW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Apr; 58(4):484-93. PubMed ID: 18422035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of Nano-Sulfide Sorbent for Efficient Removal of Elemental Mercury from Coal Combustion Fuel Gas.
    Li H; Zhu L; Wang J; Li L; Shih K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 50(17):9551-7. PubMed ID: 27508312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface compositions of carbon sorbents exposed to simulated low-rank coal flue gases.
    Olson ES; Crocker CR; Benson SA; Pavlish JH; Holmes MJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jun; 55(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 16022412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hg0 removal from flue gas over different zeolites modified by FeCl3.
    Qi H; Xu W; Wang J; Tong L; Zhu T
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Feb; 28():110-7. PubMed ID: 25662245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The secondary release of mercury in coal fly ash-based flue-gas mercury removal technology.
    He J; Duan C; Lei M; Zhu X
    Environ Technol; 2016; 37(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 26121324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-Situ Capture of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Plants Using High Surface Energy Fly Ash.
    Zhang Y; Mei D; Wang T; Wang J; Gu Y; Zhang Z; Romero CE; Pan WP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jul; 53(13):7913-7920. PubMed ID: 31188572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The performance of iodine on the removal of elemental mercury from the simulated coal-fired flue gas.
    Chi Y; Yan N; Qu Z; Qiao S; Jia J
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):776-81. PubMed ID: 19153004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Review on Adsorption Technologies for Mercury Emission Control.
    Li G; Wu Q; Xu L; Wen M; Liu K; Tang Y; Zou J; Wang F; Wang Y; Wang S
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2019 Jul; 103(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 31250069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaseous elemental mercury capture from flue gas using magnetic nanosized (Fe3-xMnx)1-δO4.
    Yang S; Yan N; Guo Y; Wu D; He H; Qu Z; Li J; Zhou Q; Jia J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1540-6. PubMed ID: 21207939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability of mercury on a novel mineral sulfide sorbent used for efficient mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas.
    Li H; Zhang M; Zhu L; Yang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Oct; 25(28):28583-28593. PubMed ID: 30091078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.