These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23597693)

  • 1. Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy.
    Bennett S; Hoffmann T; McCluskey A; Coghlan N; Tooth L
    Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 23597693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of an evidence database for occupational therapists: an international online survey.
    Bennett S; McKenna K; Hoffmann T; Tooth L; McCluskey A; Strong J
    Int J Med Inform; 2007 Jul; 76(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 16597509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Australian occupational therapists' use of an online evidence-based practice database (OTseeker).
    McKenna K; Bennett S; Dierselhuis Z; Hoffmann T; Tooth L; McCluskey A
    Health Info Libr J; 2005 Sep; 22(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 16109149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. OTseeker helps library and allied health professionals to find quality evidence efficiently.
    McCluskey A; Bennett S; Hoffmann T; Tooth L
    Health Info Libr J; 2010 Jun; 27(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 20565551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Method for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy and neurodegenerative diseases.
    Arbesman M; Lieberman D; Berlanstein DR
    Am J Occup Ther; 2014; 68(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 24367950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positioning occupational therapy as a discipline on the research continuum: results of a cross-sectional survey of research experience.
    Pighills AC; Plummer D; Harvey D; Pain T
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2013 Aug; 60(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 23888974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Method for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy and early intervention and early childhood services.
    Arbesman M; Lieberman D; Berlanstein DR
    Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 23791313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scoping reviews in occupational therapy: the what, why, and how to.
    McKinstry C; Brown T; Gustafsson L
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2014 Apr; 61(2):58-66. PubMed ID: 24125011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy interventions for older adults with low vision.
    Arbesman M; Lieberman D; Berlanstein DR
    Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 23597684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Searches and content of the OTseeker database: informing research priorities.
    Bennett S; McKenna K; Tooth L; Hoffmann T; McCluskey A; Strong J
    Am J Occup Ther; 2006; 60(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 17022340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for defining a journal subset for a clinical discipline using the bibliographies of systematic reviews.
    Wilczynski NL; Garg AX; Haynes B;
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):721-4. PubMed ID: 17911811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupation- and activity-based intervention related to productive aging.
    Arbesman M; Lieberman D
    Am J Occup Ther; 2012; 66(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 22549591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introducing OTseeker (Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence): a new evidence database for occupational therapists.
    Bennett S; Hoffmann T; McCluskey A; McKenna K; Strong J; Tooth L
    Am J Occup Ther; 2003; 57(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 14661777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
    Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.
    Shojania KG; Bero LA
    Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 11525102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality.
    Betrán AP; Say L; Gülmezoglu AM; Allen T; Hampson L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jan; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 15679886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An e-mail survey identified unpublished studies for systematic reviews.
    Reveiz L; Cardona AF; Ospina EG; de Agular S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):755-8. PubMed ID: 16765280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.