189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23597777)
1. Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems.
Alexander GE; Gutierrez S; Nayak A; Palumbo BT; Cheong D; Letson GD; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23597777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of simulated metastatic lesions on the biomechanical behavior of the proximal femur.
Benca E; Reisinger A; Patsch JM; Hirtler L; Synek A; Stenicka S; Windhager R; Mayr W; Pahr DH
J Orthop Res; 2017 Nov; 35(11):2407-2414. PubMed ID: 28240373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. QCT-based finite element prediction of pathologic fractures in proximal femora with metastatic lesions.
Benca E; Synek A; Amini M; Kainberger F; Hirtler L; Windhager R; Mayr W; Pahr DH
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10305. PubMed ID: 31311994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of deep learning-based lesion segmentation on failure load calculations of metastatic femurs using finite element analysis.
Ataei A; Eggermont F; Verdonschot N; Lessmann N; Tanck E
Bone; 2024 Feb; 179():116987. PubMed ID: 38061504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Density predicts the activity-dependent failure load of proximal femora with defects.
Michaeli DA; Inoue K; Hayes WC; Hipp JA
Skeletal Radiol; 1999 Feb; 28(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 10197454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of impending femoral neck fractures: the role of percutaneous cement augmentation for osteolytic lesions.
Palumbo BT; Nalley C; Gaskins RB; Gutierrez S; Alexander GE; Anijar L; Nayak A; Cheong D; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Mar; 29(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 24461558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The biomechanical effect of proximal tumor defect location on femur pathological fractures.
Sivasundaram R; Shah S; Ahmadi S; Wunder JS; Schemitsch EH; Ferguson PC; Zdero R
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Aug; 27(8):e174-80. PubMed ID: 23249892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite Element Analysis of Mechanical Characteristics of Internal Fixation for Treatment of Proximal Femoral Osteolytic Lesions in Children.
Wang YC; Yang D; Zhao LH; Xiao B; Ma QC; Dong LC; Li X; Zhang YG; Zhang ZM; Luo Y
Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(2):628-638. PubMed ID: 36597674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.
Shinoda Y; Kobayashi H; Kaneko M; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Oka H; Imanishi J; Sawada R; Ogura K; Tanaka S; Haga N; Kawano H
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31521453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis and CT-based structural rigidity analysis to assess failure load in bones with simulated lytic defects.
Anez-Bustillos L; Derikx LC; Verdonschot N; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Snyder BD; Nazarian A; Tanck E
Bone; 2014 Jan; 58():160-7. PubMed ID: 24145305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Hoang BH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 459():139-45. PubMed ID: 17545762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions.
Damron TA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Brown C; Grant W; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Terek RM; Anderson ME; Cheng EY; Aboulafia AJ; Gebhardt MC; Snyder BD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 26169800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?
Peterson JR; Decilveo AP; O'Connor IT; Golub I; Wittig JC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):745-756. PubMed ID: 27052019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Head-Neck Osteoplasty has Minor Effect on the Strength of an Ovine Cam-FAI Model: In Vitro and Finite Element Analyses.
Maquer G; Bürki A; Nuss K; Zysset PK; Tannast M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2633-2640. PubMed ID: 27535284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of a percutaneous technique for repairing proximal femora with simulated metastatic lesions.
Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jun; 29(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 16949854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting failure load of the femur with simulated osteolytic defects using noninvasive imaging technique in a simplified load case.
Lee T
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 35(4):642-50. PubMed ID: 17286207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDG PET/CT Assesses the Risk of Femoral Pathological Fractures in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Ulaner GA; Zindman AM; Zheng J; Kim TW; Healey JH
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 42(4):264-270. PubMed ID: 28166159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
