132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23598671)
1. Re: The portsmouth-based refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?
Shah B; Campbell P; Ford C; Goyal S; Lim KS
Eye (Lond); 2013 Jul; 27(7):892-3. PubMed ID: 23598671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?
Trikha S; Macgregor C; Jeffery M; Kirwan J
Eye (Lond); 2012 Oct; 26(10):1288-94. PubMed ID: 22766539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response to Shah et al.
Trikha S; Macgregor C; Jeffrey M; Kirwan JF
Eye (Lond); 2013 Jul; 27(7):893. PubMed ID: 23598675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme.
Ratnarajan G; Kean J; French K; Parker M; Bourne R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26088949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cambridge community Optometry Glaucoma Scheme.
Keenan J; Shahid H; Bourne RR; White AJ; Martin KR
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 43(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 25070417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service.
Devarajan N; Williams GS; Hopes M; O'Sullivan D; Jones D
Eye (Lond); 2011 Jan; 25(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 20966973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice.
Barrett C; O'Brien C; Loughman J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):400-410. PubMed ID: 29492992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).
Bourne RR; French KA; Chang L; Borman AD; Hingorani M; Newsom WD
Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 19648892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Community refinement of glaucoma referrals.
Henson DB; Spencer AF; Harper R; Cadman EJ
Eye (Lond); 2003 Jan; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12579165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The optic disc in mass screening of chronic open-angle glaucoma].
Meddeb-Ouertani A; Zhioua R; Lasram L; Trabelsi A; Anane R
Tunis Med; 1992 Feb; 70(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 1496737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Do optometrists screen for glaucoma?
Vernon SA; Henry DJ
Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():743-6. PubMed ID: 2630356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of optic disc photographs for glaucoma by UK optometrists: the Moorfields Optic Disc Assessment Study (MODAS).
Hadwin SE; Redmond T; Garway-Heath DF; Lemij HG; Reus NJ; Ward G; Anderson RS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Sep; 33(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 23634792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia.
Huang J; Yapp M; Hennessy MP; Ly A; Masselos K; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Zangerl B
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):675-683. PubMed ID: 31852027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of ophthalmoscopy by nonophthalmologists in diagnosing chronic glaucoma in West Africa.
Foster A; Wormald R; van de Heide A; Templeton K; Minassian D
Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 5)():647-50. PubMed ID: 2576536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the quality of eye care with tele-ophthalmology: shared-care glaucoma screening.
de Mul M; de Bont AA; Reus NJ; Lemij HG; Berg M
J Telemed Telecare; 2004; 10(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 15603630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What optic disc parameters are most accurately assessed using the direct ophthalmoscope?
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I
Eye (Lond); 2001 Jun; 15(Pt 3):283-7. PubMed ID: 11450721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of glaucoma referral refinement criteria on referral to, and first-visit discharge rates from, the hospital eye service: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project.
Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; French K; Kean J; Chang L; Parker M; Garway-Heath DF; Bourne RR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23406492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening performance of functional and structural measurements of neural damage in open-angle glaucoma: a case-control study from the Baltimore Eye Survey.
Vitale S; Smith TD; Quigley T; Kerrigan-Baumrind TA; Pease TE; Varma R; Friedman TS; Katz J; Tielsch JM
J Glaucoma; 2000 Oct; 9(5):346-56. PubMed ID: 11039735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient satisfaction with Peninsula Optometry Community Glaucoma Scheme.
Levy S; Booth A
Eye (Lond); 2015 Oct; 29(10):1395. PubMed ID: 25998943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Optic disc interpretation in glaucoma: is confidence misplaced?
Montgomery DM; Craig JP
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Oct; 13(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 8278191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
