152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23598772)
1. An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN).
Dawson PW; Hersbach AA; Swanson BA
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 23598772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.
Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Lenarz T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():80-7. PubMed ID: 26364512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining cochlear implant users' true noise tolerance: use of speech reception threshold in noise testing.
Poissant SF; Bero EM; Busekroos L; Shao W
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 24518402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users.
Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Houben R; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):817-28. PubMed ID: 24975235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
Cameron S; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the digit triplet test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment?
Cullington HE; Aidi T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Mar; 18(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 28120703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.
Keidser G; Dillon H; Mejia J; Nguyen CV
Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):795-800. PubMed ID: 23957444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.
van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 18569107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a corpus of Mandarin sentences in babble with homogeneity optimized via psychometric evaluation.
Xi X; Ching TY; Ji F; Zhao Y; Li JN; Seymour J; Hong MD; Chen AT; Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2012 May; 51(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 22201527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Killion MC; Niquette PA; Gudmundsen GI; Revit LJ; Banerjee S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. PubMed ID: 15532670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the North American Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences test (NA LiSN-S): sentence equivalence, normative data, and test-retest reliability studies.
Cameron S; Brown D; Keith R; Martin J; Watson C; Dillon H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):128-46. PubMed ID: 19927676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. STARR: a speech test for evaluation of the effectiveness of auditory prostheses under realistic conditions.
Boyle PJ; Nunn TB; O'Connor AF; Moore BC
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 23135616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
