These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23598843)
1. Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs. Seger AC; Churchill WW; Keohane CA; Belisle CD; Wong ST; Sylvester KW; Chesnick MA; Burdick E; Wien MF; Cotugno MC; Bates DW; Rothschild JM J Oncol Pract; 2012 Nov; 8(6):344-9, 1 p following 349. PubMed ID: 23598843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of real-time data obtained from gravimetric preparation of antineoplastic agents shows medication errors with possible critical therapeutic impact: Results of a large-scale, multicentre, multinational, retrospective study. Terkola R; Czejka M; Bérubé J J Clin Pharm Ther; 2017 Aug; 42(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 28429389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of an i.v.-compounding robot in a hospital-based cancer center pharmacy. Yaniv AW; Knoer SJ Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2013 Nov; 70(22):2030-7. PubMed ID: 24173011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety. Eckel SF; Higgins JP; Hess E; Cerbone T; Civiello JB; Conley C; Jafari N; Shah S; Speth SL; Thornton L Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(12):895-901. PubMed ID: 31361850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation and evaluation of a sterile compounding robot in a satellite oncology pharmacy. Bhakta SB; Colavecchia AC; Coffey W; Curlee DR; Garey KW Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Jun; 75(11 Supplement 2):S51-S57. PubMed ID: 29802179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of IV oncology infusions compounded via robotics and gravimetrics-assisted workflow processes. Pang B; Earl M; Knoer S; Yaniv A; Willner M; Boyd A Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2021 Jan; 78(2):122-134. PubMed ID: 33064792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Implementation of a robot for the preparation of antineoplastic drugs in the Pharmacy Service]. Pacheco Ramos Mde L; Arenaza Peña AE; Santiago Pérez A; Bilbao Gómez-Martino C; Zamora Barrios MD; Arias Fernández ML Farm Hosp; 2015 May; 39(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 26005888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sterile product compounding using an i.v. compounding workflow management system at a pediatric hospital. Moniz TT; Chu S; Tom C; Lutz P; Arnold A; Gura KM; Patterson A Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2014 Aug; 71(15):1311-7. PubMed ID: 25027539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow for nonhazardous sterile product preparation. Bucci TG; Hedrick TL; Roberts PA; Lin K; South MD; Willoughby IR; Eckel SF; Hess ET; Eberwein S; Amerine LB Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jul; 76(14):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 31361879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic compounding versus manual compounding of chemotherapy: Comparing dosing accuracy and precision. Geersing TH; Klous MG; Franssen EJF; van den Heuvel JJG; Crul M Eur J Pharm Sci; 2020 Dec; 155():105536. PubMed ID: 32877721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A three-year study of a first-generation chemotherapy-compounding robot. Nurgat Z; Faris D; Mominah M; Vibar A; Al-Jazairi A; Ewing S; Ashour M; Qaisi SK; Balhareth S; Al-Jedai A Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2015 Jun; 72(12):1036-45. PubMed ID: 26025995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Errors detected in pediatric oral liquid medication doses prepared in an automated workflow management system. Bledsoe S; Van Buskirk A; Falconer RJ; Hollon A; Hoebing W; Jokic S Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Feb; 75(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29371193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety in small community hospitals. Higgins JP; Hardt S; Cowan D; Beasley E; Eckel SF Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(13):964-969. PubMed ID: 31361882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated compounding technology and workflow solutions for the preparation of chemotherapy: a systematic review. Batson S; Mitchell SA; Lau D; Canobbio M; de Goede A; Singh I; Loesch U Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2020 Nov; 27(6):330-336. PubMed ID: 33097615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How many hospital pharmacy medication dispensing errors go undetected? Cina JL; Gandhi TK; Churchill W; Fanikos J; McCrea M; Mitton P; Rothschild JM; Featherstone E; Keohane C; Bates DW; Poon EG Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2006 Feb; 32(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 16568920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of production time and capacity for manual and robotic compounding scenarios for parenteral hazardous drugs. Geersing TH; Pourahmad DM; Lodewijk F; Franssen EJF; Knibbe CAJ; Crul M Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2024 Jun; 31(4):352-357. PubMed ID: 36792350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of implementing the aseptic compounding management system, Medcura, on internal error rates within an oncology pharmacy aseptic unit: a mixed methods evaluation. Smith E; Fox A; Willmers G; Wright D; Stuart B Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2024 Apr; 31(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 36241376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategies implementation to reduce medicine preparation error rate in neonatal intensive care units. Campino A; Santesteban E; Pascual P; Sordo B; Arranz C; Unceta M; Lopez-de-Heredia I Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 175(6):755-65. PubMed ID: 26670025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotized compounding of oncology drugs in a hospital pharmacy. Palma E; Bufarini C Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 25577883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]