137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23599013)
1. Shang Ring versus forceps-guided adult male circumcision: a randomized, controlled effectiveness study in southwestern Uganda.
Kanyago S; Riding DM; Mutakooha E; Lopez de la O A; Siedner MJ
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Oct; 64(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 23599013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized trial of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision with removal at one to three weeks: delayed removal leads to detachment.
Barone MA; Awori QD; Li PS; Simba RO; Weaver MA; Okech JO; Aduda AO; Cherutich P; Muraguri N; Wekesa JM; Nyanchoka J; Perchal P; Masson P; Lee R; Goldstein M; Kioko J; Lusi O; Sokal DC
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2012 Jul; 60(3):e82-9. PubMed ID: 22343180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized controlled trial of the shang ring versus conventional surgical techniques for adult male circumcision: safety and acceptability.
Sokal DC; Li PS; Zulu R; Awori QD; Combes SL; Simba RO; Lee R; Hart C; Perchal P; Hawry HJ; Bowa K; Goldstein M; Barone MA
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2014 Apr; 65(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 24583615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The acceptability and safety of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda.
Kigozi G; Musoke R; Watya S; Kighoma N; Ssebbowa P; Serwadda D; Nalugoda F; Makumbi F; Li P; Lee R; Goldstein M; Wawer M; Sewankambo N; Gray RH
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Aug; 63(5):617-21. PubMed ID: 23614991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical studies of shang ring male circumcision in China and Africa].
Cheng F; Lü NQ; Xu HQ; Barone MA; Lee R; Goldstein M; Li PS
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 24873152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.
Lee R; Osterberg EC; Li PS; Goldstein M; Barone M; Combes SL; Sokal D; Gray R; Kigozi G; Watya S
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Oct; 64(2):e11. PubMed ID: 24047972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Authors' reply: Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.
Kanyago S; Riding DM; Siedner MJ
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Oct; 64(2):e12. PubMed ID: 24043119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to choose appropriate ring size for Shang Ring male circumcision.
Cheng Y; Wu K; Yan Z; Guo C; Ma J; Su X; Yang S
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2012 Dec; 61(5):606-9. PubMed ID: 23018373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe.
Tshimanga M; Mangwiro T; Mugurungi O; Xaba S; Murwira M; Kasprzyk D; Montaño DE; Nyamukapa D; Tambashe B; Chatikobo P; Gundidza P; Gwinji G
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156220. PubMed ID: 27227679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Progress in the clinical studies of male circumcision using the Shang Ring].
Lü NQ; Li PS; Sokal D; Cheng Y; Peng YF; Barone M; Huang YR; Goldstein M
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Mar; 17(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 21485538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Shang Ring device for adult male circumcision: a proof of concept study in Kenya.
Barone MA; Ndede F; Li PS; Masson P; Awori Q; Okech J; Cherutich P; Muraguri N; Perchal P; Lee R; Kim HH; Goldstein M
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2011 May; 57(1):e7-12. PubMed ID: 21346586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study.
Han H; Xie DW; Zhou XG; Zhang XD
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(4):736-745. PubMed ID: 27819755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a ring device versus conventional circumcision.
Yue C; Ze-Jun Y; Wu KR; Su XJ; Hu JS; Ma JW; Guo CM; Fang HW; Su R; Zhang Y; Zhang QH
J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1849-54. PubMed ID: 22999700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: outcomes of 328 cases in China].
Cheng Y; Peng YF; Liu YD; Tian L; Lü NQ; Su XJ; Yan ZJ; Hu JS; Lee R; Kim HH; Sokal DC; Li PS
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Jul; 15(7):584-92. PubMed ID: 19694369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].
Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: comparison of clinical effectiveness].
Li HN; Xu J; Qu LM
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Apr; 16(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 20626160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision.
Cao D; Liu L; Hu Y; Wang J; Yuan J; Dong Q; Wei Q
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):799-804. PubMed ID: 25711156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda.
Kigozi G; Gray RH; Wawer MJ; Serwadda D; Makumbi F; Watya S; Nalugoda F; Kiwanuka N; Moulton LH; Chen MZ; Sewankambo NK; Wabwire-Mangen F; Bacon MC; Ridzon R; Opendi P; Sempijja V; Settuba A; Buwembo D; Kiggundu V; Anyokorit M; Nkale J; Kighoma N; Charvat B
PLoS Med; 2008 Jun; 5(6):e116. PubMed ID: 18532873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Outward versus inward placement in Shang Ring circumcision for phimosis and redundant prepuce in adult men: analysis of 527 cases].
Xie ST; Chen GY; Wei QH; Liu XT; Jiao L; Tang Y
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 24873158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A new device for removing Shang ring after circumcision ( a report of 257 cases)].
Zhang JQ; Liu JH; Jin LC; Tian L; Zhang JH; Wang Y; Zhang XD
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 96(14):1128-30. PubMed ID: 27095783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
