76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23599725)
1. Effect of Thin Prep(®) imaging system on laboratory rate and relative sensitivity of atypical squamous cells, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion not excluded and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion interpretations.
Koltz BR; Russell DK; Lu N; Bonfiglio TA; Varghese S
Cytojournal; 2013; 10():6. PubMed ID: 23599725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System does not alter the frequency of interpreting Papanicolaou tests as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Thrall MJ; Russell DK; Bonfiglio TA; Hoda RS
Cytojournal; 2008 Apr; 5():10. PubMed ID: 18435848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" : an investigation of requisite duration and number of colposcopic procedures to a definitive diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia in routine practice.
Bonvicino A; Huitron S; Fadare O
Cancer; 2007 Dec; 111(6):477-81. PubMed ID: 17932941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of cervical cytology screening methods and staining protocols for detection rate and accurate interpretation of ASC-H: Data from a high-volume laboratory in Turkey.
Ozlem A; Umit I
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):863-9. PubMed ID: 26173757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longitudinal cytological follow-up of patients with a papanicolaou test interpretation of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" that was followed by a negative reflex test for high-risk human papillomavirus types.
Rodriguez R; Fadare O
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Jan; 27(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 18156984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade intraepithelial lesion and its clinical significance in postmenopausal, pregnant, postpartum, and contraceptive-use patients.
Patton AL; Duncan L; Bloom L; Phaneuf G; Zafar N
Cancer; 2008 Dec; 114(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 18980288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of LSIL-H terminology on patient follow-up patterns: a comparison with LSIL and ASC-H.
Thrall MJ; Galfione SK; Smith DA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Nov; 41(11):960-4. PubMed ID: 23554221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Papanicolaou test in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a re-evaluation based on cytohistologic non-correlation rates in 356 concurrently obtained samples.
Carns B; Fadare O
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2008 Jan; 1(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 18784830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) on cervical samples: is it significant?
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 12827715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The association of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, hyperchromatic crowded groups and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Sep; 49(9):1008-1011. PubMed ID: 34019341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triaging Atypical Squamous Cells-Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion With p16/Ki67 Dual Stain.
Šekoranja D; Repše Fokter A
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):108-111. PubMed ID: 28244884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System (TIS): experience in a high volume academic practice.
Chivukula M; Saad RS; Elishaev E; White S; Mauser N; Dabbs DJ
Cytojournal; 2007 Feb; 4():6. PubMed ID: 17288596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in inmates from Ohio: cervical screening and biopsy follow-up.
Proca DM; Rofagha S; Keyhani-Rofagha S
Cytojournal; 2006 May; 3():15. PubMed ID: 16686955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytology and high risk HPV testing in cervical cancer screening program: Outcome of 3-year follow-up in an academic institute.
Yang J; Nolte FS; Chajewski OS; Lindsey KG; Houser PM; Pellicier J; Wang Q; Ehsani L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Jan; 46(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 29048733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.
Dziura B; Quinn S; Richard K
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 16780026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear.
van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
