These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23600042)

  • 1. Technique tips--the modified super-closed sandwich technique.
    Smithson J
    Dent Update; 2013 Mar; 40(2):155-6. PubMed ID: 23600042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nanomicrohybrid composites make posterior placement easier.
    Vargas M
    Dent Today; 2012 May; 31(5):128, 130-1. PubMed ID: 22650094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conservative restoration of compromised posterior teeth with direct composites: a 7-year report.
    Magne P
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 12(8):747-9. PubMed ID: 11404870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental materials--what goes where? Class I and II cavities.
    Burke FJ; Mackenzie L; Sands P
    Dent Update; 2013 May; 40(4):260-2, 264-6, 269-70 passim. PubMed ID: 23829006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of novel "super-closed" sandwich composite resin restorations in large MOD defects.
    Magne P; Silva S; Andrada Md; Maia H
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 26835525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral diagnosis and treatment planning: part 8. Reviews and maintenance of restorations.
    Smales R; Yip K
    Br Dent J; 2012 Oct; 213(8):387-94. PubMed ID: 23099691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Worley DC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 22342563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth. State of the art 2001.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11258095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "The simplified concept": predictable posterior composites.
    Smithson J
    Dent Today; 2012 Jan; 31(1):136-8, 140. PubMed ID: 22360120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.