These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23600042)

  • 21. Showing respect for the "neighbors'!
    Malcmacher L
    Dent Today; 2011 Dec; 30(12):88-9. PubMed ID: 22324111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
    Fourie J; Smit CF
    SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Options in restorative dentistry: resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Nazarian A
    Dent Today; 2009 Jul; 28(7):114-5. PubMed ID: 19630283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resin modified glass ionomer restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions have similar if not better retention rates than resin composites (UT CAT #628).
    Price J; Kinard S; Haveman C
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Mar; 129(3):284. PubMed ID: 22667062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of dual cure composite as dentin substitute on marginal integrity of class II open-sandwich restorations.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Dejou J; About I; Tassery H; Camps J; Proust JP
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 19363970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of external bleaching on restorative materials: a review.
    El-Murr J; Ruel D; St-Georges AJ
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2011; 77():b59. PubMed ID: 21627869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct and indirect restorative materials.
    ADA Council on Scientific Affairs
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Apr; 134(4):463-72. PubMed ID: 12733780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML; Tylka JA; Sandrik J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tooth restorations for mature people: some new hope with new materials.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1992 Jun; 123(6):66-7. PubMed ID: 1619148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The post-amalgam era: a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 May; 13(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 12752914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. "Smart" Class V Preparation Design for Direct Composites.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2015 Feb; 34(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 26349261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry--a review for the clinician.
    Berg JH
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9566012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
    Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.