These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23600350)

  • 1. The challenges of transitioning to digital breast imaging technology.
    McQuien G
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2013; 47(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 23600350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The current status of digital mammography.
    James JJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Jan; 59(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14697370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical pathways for the future: MR imaging and digital mammography.
    Newstead GM; Weinreb JC
    Radiographics; 1995 Jul; 15(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 7569140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital mammography: an update.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital mammography: current state and future aspects.
    Fischer U; Hermann KP; Baum F
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 16132935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age group.
    Yaffe MJ; Barnes GT; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):3979-82. PubMed ID: 17153375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Digital mammography].
    Otsuka K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 12881672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital mammography: coming of age.
    Morin RL; Maidment AD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):798-801. PubMed ID: 17411931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them?
    Ayyala RS; Chorlton M; Behrman RH; Kornguth PJ; Slanetz PJ
    Radiographics; 2008; 28(7):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 19001654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality control for digital mammography].
    Shinohara N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Mar; 66(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 20379070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Invariant moment shape description of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Coakley K; van Doorn T
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1995 Jun; 18(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 7669022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography.
    Johnson M
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
    Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the comparison of actual and calculated improvements in the imaging of calcifications using magnification mammography.
    Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 7322068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital mammography: do we need to convert now?
    Gur D
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 17885175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current status of full-field digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Yaffe MJ; Hemminger BM; Hendrick RE; Niklason LT; Maidment AD; Kimme-Smith CM; Feig SA; Sickles EA; Braeuning MP
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Apr; 7(4):266-80. PubMed ID: 10766101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.