277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23600620)
1. Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement.
Korsch M; Obst U; Walther W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):797-802. PubMed ID: 23600620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peri-Implantitis Associated with Type of Cement: A Retrospective Analysis of Different Types of Cement and Their Clinical Correlation to the Peri-Implant Tissue.
Korsch M; Walther W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e434-43. PubMed ID: 25180598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of excess cement and tissue response to fixed implant-supported dentures after cementation.
Korsch M; Robra BP; Walther W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e45-53. PubMed ID: 23879821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of dental cement on the peri-implant biofilm-microbial comparison of two different cements in an in vivo observational study.
Korsch M; Marten SM; Walther W; Vital M; Pieper DH; Dötsch A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):806-813. PubMed ID: 30126038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonsurgical Management of Peri-implant Bone Loss Induced by Residual Cement: Retrospective Analysis of Six Cases.
De Martinis Terra E; Berardini M; Trisi P
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(1):89–94. PubMed ID: 29451931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? A retrospective case analysis.
Linkevicius T; Puisys A; Vindasiute E; Linkeviciene L; Apse P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1179-84. PubMed ID: 22882700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cement-associated peri-implant mucositis. A 1-year follow-up after excess cement removal on the peri-implant tissue of dental implants.
Korsch M; Walther W; Bartols A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):523-529. PubMed ID: 28090743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of dental cements on peri-implant microbial community: comparison of the microbial communities inhabiting the peri-implant tissue when using different luting cements.
Korsch M; Marten SM; Dötsch A; Jáuregui R; Pieper DH; Obst U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):e161-e166. PubMed ID: 25808842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histologic findings within peri-implant soft tissue in failed implants secondary to excess cement: report of two cases and review of literature.
Ramer N; Wadhwani C; Kim A; Hershman D
N Y State Dent J; 2014 Mar; 80(2):43-6. PubMed ID: 24851393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic detection and characteristic patterns of residual excess cement associated with cement-retained implant restorations: a clinical report.
Wadhwani C; Rapoport D; La Rosa S; Hess T; Kretschmar S
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 22385690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study.
Wilson TG
J Periodontol; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1388-92. PubMed ID: 19722787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbial analysis of biofilms on cement surfaces: An investigation in cement-associated peri-implantitis.
Korsch M; Walther W; Marten SM; Obst U
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2014 Sep; 12(2):70-80. PubMed ID: 24980683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
Canullo L; Cocchetto R; Marinotti F; Oltra DP; Diago MP; Loi I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 25846254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimizing excess cement in implant-supported fixed restorations using an extraoral replica technique: a prospective 1-year study.
Frisch E; Ratka-Krüger P; Weigl P; Woelber J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1355-61. PubMed ID: 26574860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decementation Rates and the Peri-Implant Tissue Status of Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations Retained via Zinc Oxide Cement: A Retrospective 10-23-Year Study.
Woelber JP; Ratka-Krueger P; Vach K; Frisch E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 18(5):917-925. PubMed ID: 26265426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of the Association Between Cement Retention and Prevalent Peri-Implant Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Kotsakis GA; Zhang L; Gaillard P; Raedel M; Walter MH; Konstantinidis IK
J Periodontol; 2016 Mar; 87(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 26537368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abutment margin levels and residual cement occurrence in cement-retained implant restorations: An observational study.
Kim HJ; Karasan D; Park K; Kwon HB; Han JS; Lee JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jan; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 36278423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Factors Influencing Removal of the Cement Excess in Implant-Supported Restorations.
Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Maslova N; Linkeviciene L; Peciuliene V; Linkevicius T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 24224895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
