These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23600799)

  • 1. Piloting the use of 2D barcode and patient safety-software in an Australian tertiary hospital setting.
    Miller K; Akers C; Magrin G; Whitehead S; Davis AK
    Vox Sang; 2013 Aug; 105(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 23600799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causes of failure of a barcode-based pretransfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospital.
    Ohsaka A; Kobayashi M; Abe K
    Transfus Med; 2008 Aug; 18(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 18783580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to verify patient identity and blood product compatibility using an electronic bedside transfusion system.
    Staples S; O'Callaghan C; Pavord S; Staves J; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2020 Sep; 60(9):2153-2155. PubMed ID: 32830320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement in transfusion safety using a specially designed transfusion wristband.
    Lau FY; Wong R; Chui CH; Ng E; Cheng G
    Transfus Med; 2000 Jun; 10(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 10849382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure of bedside ABO testing is still the most common cause of incorrect blood transfusion in the Barcode era.
    Ahrens N; Pruss A; Kiesewetter H; Salama A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2005 Aug; 33(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15964241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Computer management to avoid errors in transfusion].
    Takahashi K
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jan; 51(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12652693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Yes, we should keep ABO agglutination test within bedside transfusion checks].
    Daurat G
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2008 Nov; 15(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 18930425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patients' positive identification systems.
    Pagliaro P; Turdo R; Capuzzo E
    Blood Transfus; 2009 Oct; 7(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 20011643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving Transfusion Safety in the Operating Room With a Barcode Scanning System Designed Specifically for the Surgical Environment and Existing Electronic Medical Record Systems: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
    Vanneman MW; Balakrishna A; Lang AL; Eliason KD; Payette AM; Xu X; Driscoll WD; Donovan KM; Deng H; Dzik WH; Levine WC
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Oct; 131(4):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 32925343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfusion recipient identification.
    Pagliaro P; Rebulla P
    Vox Sang; 2006 Aug; 91(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 16907869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Barcode technology: its role in increasing the safety of blood transfusion.
    Turner CL; Casbard AC; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2003 Sep; 43(9):1200-9. PubMed ID: 12919421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wristband identification error reporting in 712 hospitals. A College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes study of quality issues in transfusion practice.
    Renner SW; Howanitz PJ; Bachner P
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Jun; 117(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 8503724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The immunohematologic and patient safety benefits of a centralized transfusion database.
    Delaney M; Dinwiddie S; Nester TN; Aubuchon JA
    Transfusion; 2013 Apr; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 22803792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges and opportunities to prevent transfusion errors: a Qualitative Evaluation for Safer Transfusion (QUEST).
    Heddle NM; Fung M; Hervig T; Szczepiorkowski ZM; Torretta L; Arnold E; Lane S; Murphy MF;
    Transfusion; 2012 Aug; 52(8):1687-95. PubMed ID: 22229518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of an electronic barcode system for patient identification during blood transfusion: 3-year experience in a regional hospital.
    Chan JC; Chu RW; Young BW; Chan F; Chow CC; Pang WC; Chan C; Yeung SH; Chow PK; Lau J; Leung PM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2004 Jun; 10(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 15181220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bar code technology improves positive patient identification and transfusion safety.
    Sandler SG; Langeberg A; Dohnalek L
    Dev Biol (Basel); 2005; 120():19-24. PubMed ID: 16050151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Verification system for postoperative autologous blood retransfusion.
    Yoshikawa T; Kimura E; Kobayashi S; Ishihara K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():977. PubMed ID: 23920751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Implication of nurses in transfusion safety: knowledge assessment and practice evaluation at the Gustave-Roussy institute].
    Tramalloni D; Aupérin A; Oubouzar N; Lapierre V
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2005 Dec; 12(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 16616570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BT-online: an innovated and promising computer assisted transfusion system.
    Yenicesu I; Dilsiz G; Sucak G; Aki Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2008 Aug; 14(8):MT21-6. PubMed ID: 18668005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-treatment of an ABO-incompatible blood transfusion.
    Melve GK; Hervig T; Seghatchian J
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2010 Apr; 42(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 20138009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.