315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23601445)
21. Usefulness of rapid kV-switching dual energy CT in renal tumor characterization.
Çamlıdağ İ; Nural MS; Danacı M; Özden E
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1841-1849. PubMed ID: 30637472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging characterize CT-indeterminate renal masses? A prospective evaluation with histological confirmation.
Thaiss WM; Bedke J; Kruck S; Spira D; Stenzl A; Nikolaou K; Horger M; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 30324296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of computed tomography findings between renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.
Choi JH; Kim JW; Lee JY; Han WK; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Yoon YE
Korean J Urol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):695-702. PubMed ID: 26495070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pretreatment differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes by CT: the influence of different tumor enhancement measurement approaches.
Zokalj I; Marotti M; Kolarić B
Int Urol Nephrol; 2014 Jun; 46(6):1089-100. PubMed ID: 24381132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differentiation of renal oncocytoma and renal clear cell carcinoma using relative CT enhancement ratio.
Ren A; Cai F; Shang YN; Ma ES; Huang ZG; Wang W; Lu Y; Zhang XZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Jan; 128(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 25591558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from other Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes and Benign Oncocytoma Using Quantitative MDCT Enhancement Parameters.
Moldovanu CG; Petresc B; Lebovici A; Tamas-Szora A; Suciu M; Crisan N; Medan P; Buruian MM
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Oct; 56(11):. PubMed ID: 33126571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Small renal oncocytomas: is segmental enhancement inversion a characteristic finding at biphasic MDCT?
O'Malley ME; Tran P; Hanbidge A; Rogalla P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1312-5. PubMed ID: 23169723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Double-phase helical CT of small renal parenchymal neoplasms: correlation with pathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
Jinzaki M; Tanimoto A; Mukai M; Ikeda E; Kobayashi S; Yuasa Y; Narimatsu Y; Murai M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(6):835-42. PubMed ID: 11105696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are growth patterns on MRI in small (< 4 cm) solid renal masses useful for predicting benign histology?
Lim RS; McInnes MDF; Siddaiah M; Flood TA; Lavallee LT; Schieda N
Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3115-3124. PubMed ID: 29492598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Small renal oncocytomas: differentiation with multiphase CT.
Gakis G; Kramer U; Schilling D; Kruck S; Stenzl A; Schlemmer HP
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 20667676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The value of CT features and demographic data in the differential diagnosis of type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma from fat-poor angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma.
Zhou C; Ban X; Luo L; Shi C
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Nov; 47(11):3838-3846. PubMed ID: 36085376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can radiologists and urologists reliably determine renal mass histology using standard preoperative computed tomography imaging?
Monn MF; Gellhaus PT; Patel AA; Masterson TA; Tann M; Boris RS
J Endourol; 2015 Apr; 29(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 25222030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Small (< or = 4 cm) cortical renal tumors: characterization with multidetector CT.
Alshumrani G; O'Malley M; Ghai S; Metser U; Kachura J; Finelli A; Mattar K; Panzarella T
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Aug; 35(4):488-93. PubMed ID: 19536589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does Computed Tomography Still Have Limitations to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Renal Tumors for Radiologists?
Shin T; Duddalwar VA; Ukimura O; Matsugasumi T; Chen F; Ahmadi N; de Castro Abreu AL; Mimata H; Gill IS
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 28268233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The diagnostic utility of diffusion weighted MRI imaging and ADC ratio to distinguish benign from malignant renal masses: sorting the kittens from the tigers.
de Silva S; Lockhart KR; Aslan P; Nash P; Hutton A; Malouf D; Lee D; Cozzi P; MacLean F; Thompson J
BMC Urol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33888122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Value of triphasic MDCT in the differentiation of small renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma.
Scialpi M; Martorana E; Rondoni V; Eissa A; Sherbiny AE; Bevilacqua L; Ros LH; Escartín Martínez I; Milizia M; Manganaro L; Mazzei MA; D'Andrea A; Bianchi G
Urologia; 2017 Oct; 84(4):244-250. PubMed ID: 28862728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differentiation of Renal Tumor Histotypes: Usefulness of Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Fan PL; Wang WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W335-42. PubMed ID: 26295670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma by texture analysis on CT images.
Yan L; Liu Z; Wang G; Huang Y; Liu Y; Yu Y; Liang C
Acad Radiol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1115-21. PubMed ID: 26031228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
