BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23601717)

  • 1. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
    Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.
    Perlin MW; Legler MM; Spencer CE; Smith JL; Allan WP; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1430-47. PubMed ID: 21827458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validating TrueAllele
    Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
    Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New York State TrueAllele ® casework validation study.
    Perlin MW; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1458-66. PubMed ID: 23865896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new strategy for sperm isolation and STR typing from multi-donor sperm mixtures.
    Han JP; Yang F; Xu C; Wei YL; Zhao XC; Hu L; Ye J; Li CX
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():239-46. PubMed ID: 25240154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.
    Greenspoon SA; Schiermeier-Wood L; Jenkins BC
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1263-76. PubMed ID: 26258391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number (LCN) DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci.
    Kloosterman AD; Kersbergen P
    J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 15005516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
    Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Bill M; Gill P; Curran J; Clayton T; Pinchin R; Healy M; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Mar; 148(2-3):181-9. PubMed ID: 15639613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint Bayesian analysis of forensic mixtures.
    Pascali VL; Merigioli S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):735-48. PubMed ID: 22948016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrated system of ABO typing and multiplex STR testing for forensic DNA analysis.
    Jiang X; He J; Jia F; Shen H; Zhao J; Chen C; Bai L; Liu F; Hou G; Guo F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):785-97. PubMed ID: 22516188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
    Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture.
    Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2010 May; 12(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20346725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.