These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23601721)

  • 1. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Kiebuzinski GI; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):99-106. PubMed ID: 23394968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():89-99. PubMed ID: 27046517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.
    Dror IE; Charlton D; Péron AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 16325362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking data.
    Busey TA; Heise N; Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251674. PubMed ID: 34029319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison.
    Dror IE; Champod C; Langenburg G; Charlton D; Hunt H; Rosenthal R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):10-7. PubMed ID: 21129867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.
    Eldridge H; DeDonno M; Furrer J; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110408. PubMed ID: 32731198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaze behavior and cognitive states during fingerprint target group localization.
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Busey TA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Apr; 4(1):12. PubMed ID: 30953242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Latent Fingerprint Matching: Performance Gain via Feedback from Exemplar Prints.
    Arora SS; Liu E; Cao K; Jain AK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2014 Dec; 36(12):2452-65. PubMed ID: 26353151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.