These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23601722)

  • 1. The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework.
    Found B; Ganas J
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 23601722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual bias by Forensic Document Examination trainees: An empirical study from China.
    He N; Hao H
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):360-366. PubMed ID: 39025561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the "general acceptance" of handwriting identification principles.
    Saks MJ; VanderHaar H
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jan; 50(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 15831005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Context effects and observer bias--implications for forensic odontology.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21854387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.
    Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination.
    Mattijssen EJ; Kerkhoff W; Berger CE; Dror IE; Stoel RD
    Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 26976470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study on factors that affect error rates in handwriting examinations of Korean characters by forensic document examiners and non-experts.
    Kang TY; Kim H; Yook S; Lee J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111266. PubMed ID: 35278787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An insight into forensic document examiner expertise for discriminating between forged and disguised signatures.
    Dyer AG; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1154-9. PubMed ID: 18624887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Naturalistic decision making in forensic science: toward a better understanding of decision making by forensic team leaders.
    Helsloot I; Groenendaal J
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):890-7. PubMed ID: 21361940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison.
    Sita J; Found B; Rogers DK
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1117-24. PubMed ID: 12353558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of handwriting examinations beyond the traditional court purpose.
    Agius A; Jones K; Epple R; Morelato M; Moret S; Chadwick S; Roux C
    Sci Justice; 2017 Sep; 57(5):394-400. PubMed ID: 28889870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concepts and possibilities in forensic intelligence.
    Bell C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16893621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic document examiners' skill in distinguishing between natural and disguised handwriting behaviors.
    Bird C; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 20533988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forensic document examination and algorithmic handwriting analysis of Judahite biblical period inscriptions reveal significant literacy level.
    Shaus A; Gerber Y; Faigenbaum-Golovin S; Sober B; Piasetzky E; Finkelstein I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0237962. PubMed ID: 32903283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context Effects in Forensic Entomology and Use of Sequential Unmasking in Casework.
    Archer MS; Wallman JF
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(5):1270-7. PubMed ID: 27378533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic signatures: A review of dynamic feature variation and forensic methodology.
    Linden J; Marquis R; Bozza S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():216-229. PubMed ID: 30241096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The forensic examination of structural fires in Victoria, Australia: Decision-making processes and impact on judicial outcomes.
    Woodman PA; Ballantyne KN; Julian R; Spiranovic C
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jul; 61(4):369-377. PubMed ID: 34172125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.