These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23602303)

  • 21. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) comparison of three management options for waste papers: bioethanol production, recycling and incineration with energy recovery.
    Wang L; Templer R; Murphy RJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Sep; 120():89-98. PubMed ID: 22784958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Landfill reduction experience in The Netherlands.
    Scharff H
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2218-24. PubMed ID: 24999096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Novel and innovative pyrolysis and gasification technologies for energy efficient and environmentally sound MSW disposal.
    Malkow T
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 14672726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from waste management processes for municipalities--a comparative review focusing on Africa.
    Friedrich E; Trois C
    Waste Manag; 2011 Jul; 31(7):1585-96. PubMed ID: 21450453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How have waste management policies impacted the flow of municipal waste? An empirical analysis of 14 European countries.
    Malek W; Mortazavi R; Cialani C; Nordström J
    Waste Manag; 2023 Jun; 164():84-93. PubMed ID: 37037100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Review of biosolids management options and co-incineration of a biosolid-derived fuel.
    Roy MM; Dutta A; Corscadden K; Havard P; Dickie L
    Waste Manag; 2011 Nov; 31(11):2228-35. PubMed ID: 21763120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Environmental impacts and costs of solid waste: a comparison of landfill and incineration.
    Rabl A; Spadaro JV; Zoughaib A
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Apr; 26(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 18578154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. European Countries: Does common legislation guarantee better hazardous waste performance for European Union member states?
    Callao C; Martinez-Nuñez M; Latorre MP
    Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 84():147-157. PubMed ID: 30691887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic visualisation of municipal waste management performance in the EU using Ternary Diagram method.
    Pomberger R; Sarc R; Lorber KE
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():558-571. PubMed ID: 28161336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance and convergence in municipal waste treatment in the European Union.
    Castillo-Giménez J; Montañés A; Picazo-Tadeo AJ
    Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 85():222-231. PubMed ID: 30803576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integrated assessment of a new Waste-to-Energy facility in Central Greece in the context of regional perspectives.
    Perkoulidis G; Papageorgiou A; Karagiannidis A; Kalogirou S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1395-406. PubMed ID: 20061131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. EU strategies and policies on soil and waste management to offset greenhouse gas emissions.
    Marmo L
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):685-9. PubMed ID: 18042371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Greenhouse gas emissions from MSW incineration in China: impacts of waste characteristics and energy recovery.
    Yang N; Zhang H; Chen M; Shao LM; He PJ
    Waste Manag; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2552-60. PubMed ID: 22796016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pomace waste management scenarios in Québec--impact on greenhouse gas emissions.
    Gassara F; Brar SK; Pelletier F; Verma M; Godbout S; Tyagi RD
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Sep; 192(3):1178-85. PubMed ID: 21733627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion.
    Assamoi B; Lawryshyn Y
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1019-30. PubMed ID: 22099926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Driving forces for import of waste for energy recovery in Sweden.
    Olofsson M; Sahlin J; Ekvall T; Sundberg J
    Waste Manag Res; 2005 Feb; 23(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 15751390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable source of energy: current and future practices in China.
    Cheng H; Hu Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(11):3816-24. PubMed ID: 20137912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application countermeasures of non-incineration technologies for medical waste treatment in China.
    Chen Y; Ding Q; Yang X; Peng Z; Xu D; Feng Q
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1237-44. PubMed ID: 24190919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Renewable energy and greenhouse gas emissions from the waste sectors of European Union member states: a panel data analysis.
    Domingos HA; De Melo Faria AM; Fuinhas JA; Marques AC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Aug; 24(23):18770-18781. PubMed ID: 28620854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Financial implications of compliance with EU waste management goals: Feasibility and consequences in a transition country.
    Mihajlović V; Vujić G; Stanisavljević N; Batinić B
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):923-32. PubMed ID: 27357561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.