170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23602342)
1. Qualities of a French version of the Wolf Motor Function Test: a multicenter study.
Bürge E; Kupper D; Badan Bâ M; Leemann B; Berchtold A
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 May; 56(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 23602342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric properties of a modified Wolf Motor Function test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis.
Whitall J; Savin DN; Harris-Love M; Waller SM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 May; 87(5):656-60. PubMed ID: 16635628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A modified method for constraint-induced movement therapy: a supervised self-training protocol.
Hosomi M; Koyama T; Takebayashi T; Terayama S; Kodama N; Matsumoto K; Domen K
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 21596584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of the Wolf Motor Function Test in motor trials early after stroke.
Edwards DF; Lang CE; Wagner JM; Birkenmeier R; Dromerick AW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Apr; 93(4):660-8. PubMed ID: 22336104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized, multicenter, comparative study of NEURO versus CIMT in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: the NEURO-VERIFY Study.
Abo M; Kakuda W; Momosaki R; Harashima H; Kojima M; Watanabe S; Sato T; Yokoi A; Umemori T; Sasanuma J
Int J Stroke; 2014 Jul; 9(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 24015934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of French upper limb Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment in stroke.
Villepinte C; Catella E; Martin M; Hidalgo S; Téchené S; Lebely C; Castel-Lacanal E; de Boissezon X; Chih H; Gasq D
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Jan; 62(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 29660413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the streamlined Wolf motor function test as an outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Fu T; Lin KC; Feng CT; Hsieh KP; Yu HW; Lin CH; Hsieh CJ; Ota H
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2011 Feb; 25(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 20947494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke.
Lin JH; Hsu MJ; Sheu CF; Wu TS; Lin RT; Chen CH; Hsieh CL
Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 89(8):840-50. PubMed ID: 19556333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rasch validation of the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in people with chronic stroke and subacute stroke.
Chen HF; Wu CY; Lin KC; Chen HC; Chen CP; Chen CK
Phys Ther; 2012 Aug; 92(8):1017-26. PubMed ID: 22556276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation and Initial Validation of the Chinese Version of the Action Research Arm Test in People with Stroke.
Zhao JL; Chen PM; Li WF; Bian RH; Ding MH; Li H; Lin Q; Xu ZQ; Mao YR; Huang DF
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():5416560. PubMed ID: 30805366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric comparison of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke rehabilitation.
Fu TS; Wu CY; Lin KC; Hsieh CJ; Liu JS; Wang TN; Ou-Yang P
Clin Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1043-7. PubMed ID: 22180444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the Brazilian version of the Wolf Motor Function Test in adults with hemiparesis.
Pereira ND; Michaelsen SM; Menezes IS; Ovando AC; Lima RC; Teixeira-Salmela LF
Rev Bras Fisioter; 2011; 15(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 21829991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation.
Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Lin KC; Chang YF; Chen CL; Liu JS
Stroke; 2009 Apr; 40(4):1386-91. PubMed ID: 19228851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test.
Nijland R; van Wegen E; Verbunt J; van Wijk R; van Kordelaar J; Kwakkel G
J Rehabil Med; 2010 Jul; 42(7):694-6. PubMed ID: 20603702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and Validity of the Nepali Wolf Motor Function Test following Cross-cultural Adaptation.
Adhikari SP; Tretriluxana J; Chaiyawat P
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2016; 14(53):3-8. PubMed ID: 27892432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Reaching Performance Scale for 2 Wolf Motor Function Test Items.
Martinez C; Bacon H; Rowe V; Russak D; Fitzgerald E; Woodbury M; Wolf SL; Winstein C
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Nov; 101(11):2015-2026. PubMed ID: 32433993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy.
Levy R; Ruland S; Weinand M; Lowry D; Dafer R; Bakay R
J Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 108(4):707-14. PubMed ID: 18377250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke.
Amano S; Umeji A; Uchita A; Hashimoto Y; Takebayashi T; Takahashi K; Uchiyama Y; Domen K
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 25(7):500-508. PubMed ID: 30028660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients.
Lin KC; Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Chen CL; Jang Y; Liu JS
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jun; 23(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19289487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three tools to measure improvements in upper-limb function with poststroke therapy.
Thompson-Butel AG; Lin G; Shiner CT; McNulty PA
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2015 May; 29(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 25209302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
