140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23602678)
1. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification system: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study.
Papatheodorou A; Vanderzwalmen P; Panagiotidis Y; Prapas N; Zikopoulos K; Georgiou I; Prapas Y
Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Jun; 26(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 23602678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study.
De Munck N; Santos-Ribeiro S; Stoop D; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 26724798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Closed vs. Open Oocyte Vitrification Methods Are Equally Effective for Blastocyst Embryo Transfers: Prospective Study from a Sibling Oocyte Donation Program.
Gullo G; Petousis S; Papatheodorou A; Panagiotidis Y; Margioula-Siarkou C; Prapas N; D'Anna R; Perino A; Cucinella G; Prapas Y
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 32182615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective controlled study to evaluate laboratory and clinical outcomes of oocyte vitrification obtained in in vitro fertilization patients aged 30 to 39 years.
Chang CC; Elliott TA; Wright G; Shapiro DB; Toledo AA; Nagy ZP
Fertil Steril; 2013 Jun; 99(7):1891-7. PubMed ID: 23481277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme.
Stoop D; De Munck N; Jansen E; Platteau P; Van den Abbeel E; Verheyen G; Devroey P
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Feb; 24(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22222248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Open versus closed vitrification of blastocysts from an oocyte-donation programme: a prospective randomized study.
Panagiotidis Y; Vanderzwalmen P; Prapas Y; Kasapi E; Goudakou M; Papatheodorou A; Passadaki T; Petousis S; Nikolettos N; Veletza S; Prapas N; Maroulis G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 May; 26(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23507132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency of aseptic open vitrification and hermetical cryostorage of human oocytes.
Parmegiani L; Cognigni GE; Bernardi S; Cuomo S; Ciampaglia W; Infante FE; Tabarelli de Fatis C; Arnone A; Maccarini AM; Filicori M
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Oct; 23(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 21843968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How does closed system vitrification of human oocytes affect the clinical outcome? A prospective, observational, cohort, noninferiority trial in an oocyte donation program.
Papatheodorou A; Vanderzwalmen P; Panagiotidis Y; Petousis S; Gullo G; Kasapi E; Goudakou M; Prapas N; Zikopoulos K; Georgiou I; Prapas Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1348-1355. PubMed ID: 27490043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction].
Song WY; Sun YP; Jin HX; Xin ZM; Su YC; Guo YH; Chen ZJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 45(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 21029612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes.
Cai H; Niringiyumukiza JD; Li Y; Lai Q; Jia Y; Su P; Xiang W
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 30522492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Closed oocyte vitrification and storage in an oocyte donation programme: obstetric and neonatal outcome.
De Munck N; Belva F; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G; Stoop D
Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1024-33. PubMed ID: 26936884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. History of endometriosis may adversely affect the outcome in menopausal recipients of sibling oocytes.
Prapas Y; Goudakou M; Matalliotakis I; Kalogeraki A; Matalliotaki C; Panagiotidis Y; Ravanos K; Prapas N
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Nov; 25(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 23000083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.
Cobo A; de los Santos MJ; Castellò D; Gámiz P; Campos P; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Closed versus open vitrification for human blastocyst cryopreservation: A meta-analysis.
Youm HS; Choi JR; Oh D; Rho YH
Cryobiology; 2017 Aug; 77():64-70. PubMed ID: 28522355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcome of emergency egg vitrification for women when sperm extraction from the testicular tissues of the male partner is not successful.
Song WY; Sun YP; Jin HX; Xin ZM; Su YC; Chian RC
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2011 Aug; 57(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 21425921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A prospective study to compare the efficiency of oocyte vitrification using closed or open devices].
Sarandi S; Herbemont C; Sermondade N; Benoit A; Sonigo C; Poncelet C; Benard J; Gronier H; Boujenah J; Grynberg M; Sifer C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 May; 44(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 26968255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of two vitrification protocols on the developmental potential of human mature oocytes.
Paffoni A; Guarneri C; Ferrari S; Restelli L; Nicolosi AE; Scarduelli C; Ragni G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Mar; 22(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 21269885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blastocyst transfer after aseptic vitrification of zygotes: an approach to overcome an impaired uterine environment.
Vanderzwalmen P; Zech NH; Ectors F; Stecher A; Lejeune B; Vanderzwalmen S; Wirleitner B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(6):591-9. PubMed ID: 23069744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
