These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2360331)
1. Trends in mammography in Wisconsin. Lantz P; Bunge M; Remington PL Wis Med J; 1990 Jun; 89(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 2360331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In situ breast cancer: a local area analysis of Dane County, Wisconsin. Herzog S; Bush D; Remington P; Reeves M; Adler R Wis Med J; 1994 Sep; 93(9):480-2. PubMed ID: 7985390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography use--Wisconsin, 1980-1993. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1995 Oct; 44(40):754-7. PubMed ID: 7565557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast imaging trends in Wisconsin. Propeck PA; Scanlan KA WMJ; 2000 Oct; 99(7):42-6. PubMed ID: 11089450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer mortality continues to decline in Wisconsin. Cherney T; Remington P WMJ; 1999; 98(4):47-9. PubMed ID: 10555479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer screening in a rural Wisconsin community. Venugopalan M; Schmidt EW WMJ; 2001; 100(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 11688337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In situ breast cancer correlates with mammography use, Wisconsin: 1980-1992. Bush DS; Remington PL; Reeves M; Phillips JL Wis Med J; 1994 Sep; 93(9):483-4. PubMed ID: 7985391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosing breast cancer at earlier stages of disease. Fulton JP; Donahue FA; Browning C R I Med; 1994 Oct; 77(10):362. PubMed ID: 7803870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women aged 50 years and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1992. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1993 Oct; 42(38):737-41. PubMed ID: 8371707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography use in Wisconsin: 1987-1992. Lantz PM; Weier A; Remington PL Wis Med J; 1993 Oct; 92(10):580-2. PubMed ID: 8266717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography screening rates decline: a person-time approach to evaluation. Feldstein AC; Vogt TM; Aickin M; Hu WR Prev Med; 2006 Sep; 43(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 16675004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: no. Baines CJ Important Adv Oncol; 1995; ():243-51. PubMed ID: 7672810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: yes. Kopans DB Important Adv Oncol; 1995; ():231-41. PubMed ID: 7672809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer screening: recent trends in the use of mammography in Nebraska. Rettig B; Nelson N; Faulk R Nebr Med J; 1994 May; 79(5):136-8; discussion 139. PubMed ID: 8047188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer detection awareness project in Wisconsin: 1987-1988. Richards MJ; Inhorn SL Wis Med J; 1989 Sep; 88(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 2588656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer in Wisconsin: the potential for primary prevention. Lantz PM; Remington PL Wis Med J; 1991 Sep; 90(9):538-40. PubMed ID: 1949875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome measures of an Australian breast-screening program. Rodger A; Kavanagh AM Med J Aust; 1998 Aug; 169(4):179-80. PubMed ID: 9734571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]