265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23604069)
1. Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle.
Mannini A; Intille SS; Rosenberger M; Sabatini AM; Haskell W
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Nov; 45(11):2193-203. PubMed ID: 23604069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of Activity Classification Algorithms in Free-Living Older Adults.
Sasaki JE; Hickey AM; Staudenmayer JW; John D; Kent JA; Freedson PS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 26673129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Activity Recognition in Youth Using Single Accelerometer Placed at Wrist or Ankle.
Mannini A; Rosenberger M; Haskell WL; Sabatini AM; Intille SS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Apr; 49(4):801-812. PubMed ID: 27820724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer.
Zhang S; Rowlands AV; Murray P; Hurst TL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 21988935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Staudenmayer J; Lanckriet G
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26673126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning algorithms for activity recognition in ambulant children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
Ahmadi M; O'Neil M; Fragala-Pinkham M; Lennon N; Trost S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 15(1):105. PubMed ID: 30442154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity.
Zhou SM; Hill RA; Morgan K; Stratton G; Gravenor MB; Bijlsma G; Brophy S
BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e007447. PubMed ID: 25968000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hip and Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Data Analysis for Toddler Activities.
Kwon S; Zavos P; Nickele K; Sugianto A; Albert MV
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 31330889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensor-enabled Activity Class Recognition in Preschoolers: Hip versus Wrist Data.
Trost SG; Cliff DP; Ahmadi MN; Tuc NV; Hagenbuchner M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):634-641. PubMed ID: 29059107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AccNet24: A deep learning framework for classifying 24-hour activity behaviours from wrist-worn accelerometer data under free-living environments.
Farrahi V; Muhammad U; Rostami M; Oussalah M
Int J Med Inform; 2023 Apr; 172():105004. PubMed ID: 36724729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning for activity recognition: hip versus wrist data.
Trost SG; Zheng Y; Wong WK
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2183-9. PubMed ID: 25340887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.
Kerr J; Marinac CR; Ellis K; Godbole S; Hipp A; Glanz K; Mitchell J; Laden F; James P; Berrigan D
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Mar; 49(3):617-624. PubMed ID: 27755355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classifier Personalization for Activity Recognition Using Wrist Accelerometers.
Mannini A; Intille SS
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 Jul; 23(4):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 30222588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using accelerometry to classify physical activity intensity in older adults: What is the optimal wear-site?
Duncan MJ; Rowlands A; Lawson C; Leddington Wright S; Hill M; Morris M; Eyre E; Tallis J
Eur J Sport Sci; 2020 Sep; 20(8):1131-1139. PubMed ID: 31726952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive comparison of simple step counting techniques using wrist- and ankle-mounted accelerometer and gyroscope signals.
Rhudy MB; Mahoney JM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Apr; 42(3):236-243. PubMed ID: 29846134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Lean and Performant Hierarchical Model for Human Activity Recognition Using Body-Mounted Sensors.
Debache I; Jeantet L; Chevallier D; Bergouignan A; Sueur C
Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32486068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intermonitor reliability of the GT3X+ accelerometer at hip, wrist and ankle sites during activities of daily living.
Ozemek C; Kirschner MM; Wilkerson BS; Byun W; Kaminsky LA
Physiol Meas; 2014 Feb; 35(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 24399138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
