These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23606456)

  • 1. Image cytometer method for automated assessment of human spermatozoa concentration.
    Egeberg DL; Kjaerulff S; Hansen C; Petersen JH; Glensbjerg M; Skakkebaek NE; Jørgensen N; Almstrup K
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 23606456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of image cytometry for sperm concentration measurement: Comparison with manual counting of 4010 human semen samples.
    Egeberg Palme DL; Johannsen TH; Petersen JH; Skakkebæk NE; Juul A; Jørgensen N; Almstrup K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2017 May; 468():114-119. PubMed ID: 28242391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automation of semen analysis using flow cytometer in comparison with manual methods.
    Saleh M; Fathy A; El-Akras AI; Eyada MM; Younes S; El-Gohary AM
    Egypt J Immunol; 2005; 12(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 16734137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of flow cytometric methods to measure human sperm concentration.
    Eustache F; Jouannet P; Auger J
    J Androl; 2001; 22(4):558-67. PubMed ID: 11451352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is flow cytometry really adapted to the determination of sperm concentration?
    Lu JC; Chen F; Xu HR; Wu YM; Xia XY; Huang YF; Lu NQ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 17558894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
    Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Use of Makler counting chamber in semen analysis].
    Tomoyoshi T; Ishida A; Kim CJ
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Nov; 34(11):1931-3. PubMed ID: 3242367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
    Agarwal A; Sharma RK
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different methods for assessment of sperm concentration and membrane integrity with bull semen.
    Anzar M; Kroetsch T; Buhr MM
    J Androl; 2009; 30(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 19478330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the sperm class analyser CASA system for sperm counting in a busy diagnostic semen analysis laboratory.
    Dearing CG; Kilburn S; Lindsay KS
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Mar; 17(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24359435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control in boar semen production by use of the FACSCount AF system.
    Christensen P; Knudsen DB; Wachmann H; Madsen MT
    Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1218-28. PubMed ID: 15325548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
    Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of automated imaging and analysis technology for the detection of aneuploidy in human sperm.
    Carrell DT; Emery BR
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Aug; 90(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 17936284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capillary-loaded particle fluid dynamics: effect on estimation of sperm concentration.
    Douglas-Hamilton DH; Smith NG; Kuster CE; Vermeiden JP; Althouse GC
    J Androl; 2005; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 15611575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel centrifugal technology for measuring sperm concentration in the home.
    Schaff UY; Fredriksen LL; Epperson JG; Quebral TR; Naab S; Sarno MJ; Eisenberg ML; Sommer GJ
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Feb; 107(2):358-364.e4. PubMed ID: 27887718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used.
    Maree L; du Plessis SS; Menkveld R; van der Horst G
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1369-82. PubMed ID: 20400771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-assisted image analysis of sperm concentration in human semen before and after swim-up separation: comparison with assessment by haemocytometer.
    Chan SY; Wang C; Song BL; Lo T; Leung A; Tsoi WL; Leung J
    Int J Androl; 1989 Oct; 12(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 2592122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a fluorescent computer-assisted spermatozoal quantification method and a comparison of results for manual counting with a haemocytometer and computer-assisted semen analysis in dogs.
    Watts J
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Nov; 54(11):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 31441976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.