These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23606488)

  • 1. Remote ischemic preconditioning in elective percutaneous coronary intervention does not protect myocardium nor mobilize endothelial progenitor cells.
    Abdel-Latif A; Moliterno DJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):937-8. PubMed ID: 23606488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remote ischemic preconditioning immediately before percutaneous coronary intervention does not impact myocardial necrosis, inflammatory response, and circulating endothelial progenitor cell counts: a single center randomized sham controlled trial.
    Prasad A; Gössl M; Hoyt J; Lennon RJ; Polk L; Simari R; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Lerman A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):930-6. PubMed ID: 22517646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remote ischemic preconditioning improves outcome at 6 years after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: the CRISP stent trial long-term follow-up.
    Davies WR; Brown AJ; Watson W; McCormick LM; West NE; Dutka DP; Hoole SP
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 23696599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces peri-procedural myocardial injury in elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.
    Zografos TA; Katritsis GD; Katritsis DG
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 May; 173(3):530-2. PubMed ID: 24681008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on serum troponin T level following elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Ahmed RM; Mohamed el-HA; Ashraf M; Maithili S; Nabil F; Rami R; Mohamed TI
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(5):E647-53. PubMed ID: 23404916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference of propofol with signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 activation and cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Kottenberg E; Musiolik J; Thielmann M; Jakob H; Peters J; Heusch G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):376-82. PubMed ID: 23465551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote ischemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention: renal effect beyond the cardioprotection.
    Liu Y; Luo B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1017. PubMed ID: 23804421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces periprocedural myocardial infarction for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Zografos T
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Nov; 10(7):891-2. PubMed ID: 24974810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remote ischaemic preconditioning: the missing link between bench and bedside.
    Moretti C; Cavallero E; Cerrato E
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Nov; 10(7):892. PubMed ID: 25568913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Elective PCI?
    Giblett JP; Hoole SP
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Jul; 22(4):310-315. PubMed ID: 28376636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Preventing Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions/Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Bei WJ; Duan CY; Chen JY; Wang K; Liu YH; Liu Y; Tan N
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther; 2016 Jan; 21(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 26112028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which is more important in the potential interference on cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning: β-blockers or anesthetic choice?
    Liu Y; Ma L
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1305-6. PubMed ID: 24128912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender disparity may contribute to the quasi preservation of cardioprotection by remote preconditioning with isoflurane but not propofol in CABG.
    Zhou C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 146(3):732-3. PubMed ID: 23953310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reply to the editor.
    Kottenberg E; Peters J; Heusch G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 146(3):733-4. PubMed ID: 23953311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of one-cycle remote ischemic preconditioning to reduce myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Zografos TA; Katritsis GD; Tsiafoutis I; Bourboulis N; Katsivas A; Katritsis DG
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(12):2013-7. PubMed ID: 24793669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why did remote ischaemic conditioning not improve clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction in the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI trial?
    Hausenloy DJ; Bøtker HE
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Dec; 115(14):e161-e163. PubMed ID: 31621833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on myocardial injury and endothelial function and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
    Zhou FZ; Song W; Yin LH; Song ZF; Yang S; Yang FB; Liu JF; Song YG; Zhang HY; Zhang ZM
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2017 Oct; 21(20):4642-4648. PubMed ID: 29131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces periprocedural myocardial infarction for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
    D'Ascenzo F; Moretti C; Omedè P; Cerrato E; Cavallero E; Er F; Presutti DG; Colombo F; Crimi G; Conrotto F; Dinicolantonio JJ; Chen S; Prasad A; Biondi Zoccai G; Gaita F
    EuroIntervention; 2014; 9(12):1463-71. PubMed ID: 24755386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on biomarkers of stress and injury-related signalling in patients having isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement using cardiopulmonary bypass: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Fiorentino F; Angelini GD; Suleiman MS; Rahman A; Anderson J; Bryan AJ; Culliford LA; Moscarelli M; Punjabi PP; Reeves BC
    Trials; 2015 Apr; 16():181. PubMed ID: 25899533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of endothelial progenitor cells in restenosis and progression of coronary atherosclerosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective study.
    Pelliccia F; Cianfrocca C; Rosano G; Mercuro G; Speciale G; Pasceri V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jan; 3(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 20129574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.