These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23606704)

  • 1. Measurement error in the assessment of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials: the smallest detectable change (SDC) revisited.
    Navarro-Compán V; van der Heijde D; Ahmad HA; Miller CG; Wolterbeek R; Landewé R
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2014 Jun; 73(6):1067-70. PubMed ID: 23606704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiography as primary outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: acceptable sample sizes for trials with 3 months' follow up.
    Bruynesteyn K; Landewé R; van der Linden S; van der Heijde D
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Nov; 63(11):1413-8. PubMed ID: 15037445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rate of adjudication of radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis randomized controlled trials depending on preset limits of agreement: a pooled analysis from 15 randomized trials.
    Navarro-Compán V; Landewé R; Ahmad HA; Miller CG; Xu D; Wolterbeek R; van der Heijde D
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2013 Aug; 52(8):1404-7. PubMed ID: 23329683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Sharp/van der Heijde method out-performed the Larsen/Scott method on the individual patient level in assessing radiographs in early rheumatoid arthritis.
    Bruynesteyn K; van der Heijde D; Boers M; van der Linden S; Lassere M; van der Vleuten C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 15196621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression.
    Lassere M; Boers M; van der Heijde D; Boonen A; Edmonds J; Saudan A; Verhoeven AC
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):731-9. PubMed ID: 10090192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The smallest detectable difference and sensitivity to change of magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic scoring of structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis finger, wrist, and toe joints: a comparison of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score applied to different joint combinations and the Sharp/van der Heijde radiographic score.
    Ejbjerg BJ; Vestergaard A; Jacobsen S; Thomsen HS; Østergaard M
    Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Aug; 52(8):2300-6. PubMed ID: 16052593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of 5 methods for scoring hand radiographic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Guillemin F; Billot L; Boini S; Gerard N; Ødegaard S; Kvien TK
    J Rheumatol; 2005 May; 32(5):778-86. PubMed ID: 15868609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hand bone densitometry: a more sensitive standard for the assessment of early bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Haugeberg G; Green MJ; Conaghan PG; Quinn M; Wakefield R; Proudman SM; Stewart S; Hensor E; Emery P
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2007 Nov; 66(11):1513-7. PubMed ID: 17491097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between disease activity and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal analysis.
    Welsing PM; Landewé RB; van Riel PL; Boers M; van Gestel AM; van der Linden S; Swinkels HL; van der Heijde DM
    Arthritis Rheum; 2004 Jul; 50(7):2082-93. PubMed ID: 15248205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal clinically important difference in radiological progression of joint damage over 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results of a validation study with clinical experts.
    Bruynesteyn K; van der Heijde D; Boers M; Lassere M; Boonen A; Edmonds J; Houben H; Paulus H; Peloso P; Saudan A; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 2001 Apr; 28(4):904-10. PubMed ID: 11327274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which factors influence radiographic progression during treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in clinical practice? Results from 930 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry.
    Ørnbjerg LM; Østergaard M; Bøyesen P; Krogh NS; Thormann A; Tarp U; Poulsen UE; Espesen J; Schlemmer A; Graudal N; Kollerup G; Jensen DV; Madsen OR; Glintborg B; Christensen T; Lindegaard H; Bøhme W; Hansen A; Andersen AR; Hetland ML
    J Rheumatol; 2014 Dec; 41(12):2352-60. PubMed ID: 25274894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages.
    Boini S; Guillemin F
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Sep; 60(9):817-27. PubMed ID: 11502606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Erosive progression is minimal, but erosion healing rare, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. A 1 year investigator-initiated follow-up study using high-resolution computed tomography as the primary outcome measure.
    Møller Døhn U; Boonen A; Hetland ML; Hansen MS; Knudsen LS; Hansen A; Madsen OR; Hasselquist M; Møller JM; Østergaard M
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2009 Oct; 68(10):1585-90. PubMed ID: 19019887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Markers for type II collagen breakdown predict the effect of disease-modifying treatment on long-term radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Landewé R; Geusens P; Boers M; van der Heijde D; Lems W; te Koppele J; van der Linden S; Garnero P
    Arthritis Rheum; 2004 May; 50(5):1390-9. PubMed ID: 15146408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability of precision in scoring radiographic abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis by experienced readers.
    Sharp JT; Wolfe F; Lassere M; Boers M; Van Der Heijde D; Larsen A; Paulus H; Rau R; Strand V
    J Rheumatol; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1062-72. PubMed ID: 15170916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Damage and progression on radiographs in individual joints: data from pivotal randomized controlled trials.
    Landewé RB; Strand V; Conaghan PG; van der Heijde D
    J Rheumatol; 2011 Sep; 38(9):2018-22. PubMed ID: 21885510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a simple algorithm of baseline parameters can predict radiographic damage, disability, and disease course at 12-year followup.
    Drossaers-Bakker KW; Zwinderman AH; Vliet Vlieland TP; Van Zeben D; Vos K; Breedveld FC; Hazes JM
    Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Aug; 47(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 12209484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of early radiographic damage with impaired physical function in rheumatoid arthritis: a ten-year, longitudinal observational study in 238 patients.
    Ødegård S; Landewé R; van der Heijde D; Kvien TK; Mowinckel P; Uhlig T
    Arthritis Rheum; 2006 Jan; 54(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 16385497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Documenting damage progression in a two-year longitudinal study of rheumatoid arthritis patients with established disease (the DAMAGE study cohort): is there an advantage in the use of magnetic resonance imaging as compared with plain radiography?
    Bird P; Kirkham B; Portek I; Shnier R; Joshua F; Edmonds J; Lassere M
    Arthritis Rheum; 2004 May; 50(5):1383-9. PubMed ID: 15146407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rheumatoid arthritis joint progression in sustained remission is determined by disease activity levels preceding the period of radiographic assessment.
    Aletaha D; Funovits J; Breedveld FC; Sharp J; Segurado O; Smolen JS
    Arthritis Rheum; 2009 May; 60(5):1242-9. PubMed ID: 19404938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.