These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23607144)
1. When pregnancy is an injury: rape, law, and culture. Bridges KM Stanford Law Rev; 2013 Mar; 65(3):457-516. PubMed ID: 23607144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality? Hammell H Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnancy as a harm? Kraft RE Perspect Biol Med; 2012; 55(2):201-17. PubMed ID: 22643758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Further evidence on the internal validity of the early legal access research design. Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):899-904. PubMed ID: 24665473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument. Siegel RB Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last. Siano JR Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. If only policy analysis were so easy. Joyce T J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 24665472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--abortion rights--fourth circuit declares Virginia partial birth infanticide statute unconstitutional per se.--Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Hicks, 409 F.3d 619 (4th Cir.), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, 422 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2005). Harv Law Rev; 2005 Dec; 119(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 16489721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53. Peto A; Kossuth E Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies. Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of gender-specific legislation, 1999. Howes J; Bass M J Gend Specif Med; 1999; 2(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 11279866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Degendering reproduction? Jackson E Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):346-68. PubMed ID: 18695265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited. Smith PA Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights. Schehr AR Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change? Joyce T J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom. Arellano Mde J Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent evidence on the broad benefits of reproductive health policy. Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):888-96. PubMed ID: 24665471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of sexism on women's health and health care. Turshen M J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 8408607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]