285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23607144)
1. When pregnancy is an injury: rape, law, and culture.
Bridges KM
Stanford Law Rev; 2013 Mar; 65(3):457-516. PubMed ID: 23607144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?
Hammell H
Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnancy as a harm?
Kraft RE
Perspect Biol Med; 2012; 55(2):201-17. PubMed ID: 22643758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Further evidence on the internal validity of the early legal access research design.
Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):899-904. PubMed ID: 24665473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument.
Siegel RB
Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
Siano JR
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. If only policy analysis were so easy.
Joyce T
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 24665472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--abortion rights--fourth circuit declares Virginia partial birth infanticide statute unconstitutional per se.--Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Hicks, 409 F.3d 619 (4th Cir.), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, 422 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2005).
Harv Law Rev; 2005 Dec; 119(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 16489721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53.
Peto A; Kossuth E
Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
Cherry AL
Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of gender-specific legislation, 1999.
Howes J; Bass M
J Gend Specif Med; 1999; 2(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 11279866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Degendering reproduction?
Jackson E
Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):346-68. PubMed ID: 18695265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
Smith PA
Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
Schehr AR
Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change?
Joyce T
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.
Arellano Mde J
Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mónica Roa: legal champion of abortion rights.
Mohammadi D
Lancet; 2015 Jan; 385(9964):221. PubMed ID: 25706699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent evidence on the broad benefits of reproductive health policy.
Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):888-96. PubMed ID: 24665471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of sexism on women's health and health care.
Turshen M
J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 8408607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
