291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23607318)
1. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions.
Simões RB; Campaner AB
APMIS; 2013 Dec; 121(12):1153-61. PubMed ID: 23607318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
Bogani G; DI Donato V; Sopracordevole F; Ciavattini A; Ghelardi A; Lopez S; Simoncini T; Plotti F; Casarin J; Serati M; Pinelli C; Valenti G; Bergamini A; Gardella B; Dell'acqua A; Monti E; Vercellini P; Fischetti M; D'Ippolito G; Aguzzoli L; Mandato VD; Carunchio P; Carlinfante G; Giannella L; Scaffa C; Falcone F; Borghi C; Ditto A; Malzoni M; Giannini A; Salerno MG; Liberale V; Contino B; Donfrancesco C; Desiato M; Perrone AM; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Ferrero S; Sarpietro G; Matarazzo MG; Cianci A; Bosio S; Ruisi S; Guerrisi R; Brusadelli C; Mosca L; Tinelli R; DE Vincenzo R; Zannoni GF; Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Dessole S; Angioli R; Greggi S; Spinillo A; Ghezzi F; Colacurci N; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):636-641. PubMed ID: 32893030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of human papillomavirus testing after conization by loop electrosurgical excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Houfflin Debarge V; Collinet P; Vinatier D; Ego A; Dewilde A; Boman F; Leroy JL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Sep; 90(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 13678729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of recurrence in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization.
Ge Y; Liu Y; Cheng Y; Liu Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(27):e26359. PubMed ID: 34232170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human papillomavirus combined with cytology and margin status identifies patients at risk for recurrence after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Ruano Y; Torrents M; Ferrer FJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 26189247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of the recurrence and residual lesions incidence after loop electroexcisional procedure and cold knife conisation].
Kabzińska-Turek M; Basta A; Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K; Knafel A; Zajac K; Przybylska-Jurecka P; Jach R; Milewicz T
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):658-62. PubMed ID: 23401984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study.
Abdulaziz AMA; You X; Liu L; Sun Y; Zhang J; Sun S; Li X; Sun W; Dong Y; Liu H; Zhang Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(20):e26030. PubMed ID: 34011112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Murta EF; Silva AO; Silva EA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 16550969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.
Chen JY; Wang ZL; Wang ZY; Yang XS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12792. PubMed ID: 30313104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disease persistence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing electrosurgical conization.
Costa S; De Nuzzo M; Infante FE; Bonavita B; Marinelli M; Rubino A; Rambelli V; Santini D; Cristiani P; Bucchi L
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Apr; 85(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 11925130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
